Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Fairbot Automation Discussion

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Automation
558 Posts 46 Posters 86.8k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by A Former User
    #321

    @paul-milbourn said in Fairbot Automation Discussion:

    @steven-fletcher Cheers for this Stephen, I have found it really helpful. Not a complaint or moan (I only just noticed it tbh) but just to let you know and a warning for others who import it looks like the 2-1 & 1-2 scorelines are missing. Easy to sort out but I just thought id let others know.

    Hi Paul

    was this a second half goal strat as mine doesnt have scorelines in it....

    Here is my latest one with exceptions to stop from re entering if you want one

    0_1673822489440_40eabeb2-c364-4c85-b3da-eb97eb164a65-image.png

    0_1673822363341_SHG 2023.fs

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #322

    @steven-fletcher Cheers for this Stephen, I have found it really helpful. Not a complaint or moan (I only just noticed it tbh) but just to let you know and a warning for others who import it looks like the 2-1 & 1-2 scorelines are missing. Easy to sort out but I just thought id let others know.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Fraser cord
    replied to Kevin Pepper on last edited by
    #323

    @kevin-pepper @Steven-Fletcher Thanks

    Il have a play around with it and see where it gets me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevin Pepper
    replied to Kevin Pepper on last edited by
    #324

    @kevin-pepper said in Fairbot Automation Discussion:

    @fraser-cord Hi Fraser, your General rule doesn't have a stop time. For the bet that was placed at 17, have checked when it was placed, did it go in-running?
    Also, your Conditions are using Best Back Prices but in Action you are laying at Best Lay Price. So the Conditions might be met with a Best Back Price of say 14.5 but if there are a few ticks to the Best Lay Price then you could well lay at 17,
    I'd be inclined to set the Action Lay Bet to use Best Back Price + 1 tick so you're first in the queue.
    Hope that helps
    Kevin

    Just seen Steven's message while I was typing and echo what he's said. To his point about the bet going unmatched you could set to Keep or Take SP. Alternatively set it to Fill or Kill, increase the number of Executions in the General settings and make sure you add a Condition to check that there aren't any matched lay bets

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevin Pepper
    replied to Fraser cord on last edited by
    #325

    @fraser-cord Hi Fraser, your General rule doesn't have a stop time. For the bet that was placed at 17, have checked when it was placed, did it go in-running?
    Also, your Conditions are using Best Back Prices but in Action you are laying at Best Lay Price. So the Conditions might be met with a Best Back Price of say 14.5 but if there are a few ticks to the Best Lay Price then you could well lay at 17,
    I'd be inclined to set the Action Lay Bet to use Best Back Price + 1 tick so you're first in the queue.
    Hope that helps
    Kevin

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Fraser cord on last edited by
    #326

    @fraser-cord you could change it to this to limit the lay price in relation to the back price

    0_1673779188384_7884ea7b-34a0-4786-93f6-b045a5347832-image.png

    not sure if this would risk unmatched bets though as not tried this before but you could play around with the number of ticks over the back price you want your lay to be

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Fraser cord
    replied to Kevin Pepper on last edited by
    #327

    @kevin-pepper This is the general and action tabs
    0_1673778055064_ab13c46a-1ea6-4505-a772-127f6122e1d0-image.png

    0_1673778144135_490e2641-ce8e-4b22-a2ee-2b925a6df470-image.png

    ? K 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Harris
    replied to Andy Harris on last edited by
    #328

    @andy-harris said in Fairbot Automation Discussion:

    @panagiotis this is what I have come up with so far, sometimes it works and others the trade doesn't make a profit, it's a small loss and I don't think the SL was triggered. Still trying to figure it out...
    0_1673728041665_a8a6a86e-1b2a-423d-8462-0598078dfce5-image.png

    I have tweaked the smart bets option on the trade and the timing of the green up rule so it should now work. I'm current;y in the testing process with it.
    0_1673767013656_Up a tick down a tick scalping.fs

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Harris
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #329

    @panagiotis this is what I have come up with so far, sometimes it works and others the trade doesn't make a profit, it's a small loss and I don't think the SL was triggered. Still trying to figure it out...
    0_1673728041665_a8a6a86e-1b2a-423d-8462-0598078dfce5-image.png

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevin Pepper
    replied to Fraser cord on last edited by
    #330

    @fraser-cord Hi Fraser, the logic looks ok to me but what do you have in the General settings?

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Fraser cord
    wrote on last edited by
    #331

    Hello all

    Wondering if someone who is better with fairbot could explain this and help me find a solution.

    Was trying to add an extra rule to lay beaten fav bot kindly posted on here. Been testing and everything appeared to be working fine. Just checked today and I had a loser which was outwith the parameters. Im wondering if I have selected the wrong price, should I be selecting best lay price where circled in red.
    0_1673717810773_48b0b976-3cf0-43fc-857e-e25d809aa782-image.png

    My thinking, I wanted to ensure the bot only triggers if my selection has a greater price than the Fav by at least 5 ticks. It still shouldn't trigger if the horse's back price is above 15. It took a horse, lay price 17 (so im guessing could have had a back price of 14.5 or 15)?

    cheers

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Kevin Pepper on last edited by
    #332

    @kevin-pepper said in Fairbot Automation Discussion:

    @lee-woodman said in Fairbot Automation Discussion:

    Did i see a fairbot automation file for Ryans Split Stake?

    I'm not sure you did Lee but I did one a while back. However, it was set up as separate files for O1.5 and O0.5 but the functionality now let's you place trades across both markets from one file. I'll see if I can dust it off and do an updated version (though it'll need proper review/testing). Will try and take a look over the weekend
    Kevin

    Here is my effort, has seemed ok so far in testing if anyone wants to give it a test

    think its set for 2% on each entry at the moment

    0_1673685790479_78a0377a-27e6-4e5b-9d9d-5cdf23836d9a-image.png

    0_1673685800132_Ryan's Split Stake - testing.fs

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevin Pepper
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #333

    @lee-woodman said in Fairbot Automation Discussion:

    Did i see a fairbot automation file for Ryans Split Stake?

    I'm not sure you did Lee but I did one a while back. However, it was set up as separate files for O1.5 and O0.5 but the functionality now let's you place trades across both markets from one file. I'll see if I can dust it off and do an updated version (though it'll need proper review/testing). Will try and take a look over the weekend
    Kevin

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #334

    Did i see a fairbot automation file for Ryans Split Stake?

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Dan MacKinnon on last edited by
    #335

    @dan-mackinnon Oh this is excellent, and very reassuring, thanks!!

    I'll do my best over the next few weeks to get something sorted with the remaining horse strategies. I really like the idea of contributing here, so this will hopefully be a good fit for me

    Cheers!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Fraser cord on last edited by
    #336

    @fraser-cord This is really reassuring to hear. It's my first time on a forum like this, so hearing that we're in a highly supportive environment is a really good feeling lol.

    And yeah, I'm really new too, and the learning curve with all this is blowing my mind a bit tbh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by A Former User
    #337

    @steven-fletcher Oh no! The emails are great (I think). And yeah, it was for the horses mainly.

    This is good advice, I'll do my best to work out how to do the rest of the preset strategies over the next few weeks (I think there's only 3 left, and only one of those looks tricky..)

    Quick little edit: Idk if you've seen, but @martin sent out an email today asking for members who don't get the daily email to get in touch so they can be added.

    My email arrived at 11am-ish on Tues, just in case your inbox is as much of a mess as mine lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dan MacKinnon
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #338

    @stephen-beale I keep forgetting to update the OP so if you’re happy giving it a go and want me to add them then you’re more than welcome.

    Sometimes it’s better to do that because everyone has a look and might chip in with advice. As we’ve all come into this as newbies there’s no one way to approach it and we all just learn together

    “Greed moves the goalposts” - Ryan Holiday

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Fraser cord
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #339

    @stephen-beale I recently went to automation and chose fairbot for that exact reason. We are really lucky so many folk have made and shared bots on here. With a bit of perseverance, you can get there. The bots don't match all email strategies exactly but not too far away.

    Folk on the forum have been extreamly helpful too. Would not know where to begin otherwise. Im still a beginner but slowing learning the ropes.
    Cant speak highly enough of the support from so many on here.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #340

    @stephen-beale i dont get the daily emails anymore so not sure what's on them but i think there have been a number of the main ones posted (were these football or horses?)

    Having a crack yourself is probably the best way to start as some of them are quite straight forward and it lets you get a good understanding of the rule and the automation behind it.....if you then post them in here there are normally people who can have a look at them for you

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.