*****New Football Thread*****
-
I've taken Celtic to win at 1.22 tonight.
I like those odds. 1.22 is the minimum I'd take for SHG, so I fully expect Celtic to win tonight. So does the market!
-
Couple of trades possible tonight as follows:
O2.5 Brazil Internacional vs America MG
(Rules: split stake from start out after 60 mins if no goal, out with green whenever there's a goal or cash out to free bet, Limit loss by coming out and going back in after first split stake (15 mins) and monitor in play stats. First two drip stakes automatic - next two depend on minimum 3 SOT and further SOT))02.5 Brazil, Cortiba vs Gremio
(Same staking as above but note this is on my "stats busting" filter so always stake cautiously - its my most tweaked filter and under its latest incarnation the % chance of 02.5 looks rubbish but over 235 games since last tweak of the filter its a SR of 89%)
01.5 Brazil Internacional vs Gremio
(Rules split stake out after 70 mins if no goal, limit loss by coming out and going back in after first split stake (15 mins) and monitor in play stats. First two drip stakes automatic - next two depend on minimum 3 SOT and further SOT)
LTD
Celtic vs St Mirren (if odds get reasonable and inlay stats favourable otherwise will leave it alone)
-
@Richard-Latimer its split stake out by 70 mins.
I enter early and nowadays, trade out and back in after 15 mins just to protect depletion of first drip, monitor in play stats and take the loss at 70.
I reset my spreadsheets a while back but the 90% dates back to the start circa 1500 trades but for example my up to date spreadsheet there are (neatly) 600 trades starting 18th September 2022 - 537 green 63 red, 90% SR.. The one thing to note is there isn't the minimum number of matches in season on it .. which I'm analysing whether to add or not
-
@Mark-Maguire for the over 1.5 is this set and forget? How long are the 1500 trades over?
-
@Andy-Donnelly I love ELO ratings
-
@Mark-Maguire Thanks, will take a look.
Haven’t used ELO ratings much, will need to take a look at those
-
@Mark-Maguire Corrr blimey a set and forget LTD at 86% SR stuff dreams are made of that!
-
@Andy-Donnelly no prob .. I use settings which if I remember rightly I adapted from a filter which existed .. and just added ELO..
Over 1.5 FT > 80%
Ov goals scored per match avg >= 2
Ov FT 02.5 % >65Then an either or for the ELO ratings .. Home needs to be 100 more than opposition OR away needs to be 150 more than opposition
Should add that I work on split stake and exit after 70 mins regardless if no goal. I also protect with stop loss with the early drip stakes
-
@Mark-Maguire Nice work. May I ask, what’s your filter settings for your O1.5 strategy? Intrigued as it’s a market I’ve struggled with in the last year.
-
@Tony-Hastie get your tips out!
-
@Mark-Maguire never fear posting your trades, we take responsibility for our own trades!
-
@Ryan Cheers again .. and for all the help!!
Aim now is to be accountable here. In the past I struggled when I went through periods of maybe over posting my trades and ending up feeling responsible when they went wrong.
However three years in and the headline is that my focus remains football with some learning on the horse racing in the background. Without repeating too much of what I've said in the past ..
I have 4 (yes 4) versions of an Over 2.5 strategy - nuanced but have never dropped them because they have strike rates of between 86% and 89% individually tested/traded with between 500 and 2000 trades. I have used ELO and other stats (Poisson) to narrow down final selection and most important with mind set the focus is minimise losing trades and maximise wins (sounds simple and obvious but...) key is to trust the strike rate as well as stay very disciplined with in play stats and indicators getting out when I should.
Then I have an LTD inspired by Ryan added ELO to Betgreen and thats got a strike rate on set and forget of 84% - which goes up to 86% with home favourites - I can improve profit by using stop losses and monitoring in play and am also using analysis of leagues and countries to dictate which I trade.. example strike rate Belgium 89% Denmark 69%, Strike Rate Bundesliga 88% Bundesliga 2 92% .. aim here is to minimise losing trades and improve final selection.
Then an o1.5 inspired by Keith. SR is 90% at present over 1500 trades - challenge here is the concept of value and how to trade more efficiently to maximise return. With the SR it may be one I look to automate.
Then finally testing an Under2.5 strategy with a view to get out after 20mins/half an hour - potential to automate .. its early days on this but Unders are of interest generally speaking and will definitely be developing strategies on these, both from start and as a reaction to goals because my deep dive into stats tells me there are sweet spots where you can expect a 15-20 minute gap between goals.. but far too early to celebrate on this.
Overall therefore I will look to post selections, rationale and results where I can, as well as learning from everyone here .
-
@Mark-Maguire Welcome back! Excited to hear of the full time news and will be good to see what happens next for you buddy.
-
@Richard-Latimer Cool man, all the best for the coming weeks/months.
-
@Nick-Segura said in *****New Football Thread*****:
@Richard-Latimer I was going to ask if this was a raw spreadsheet or if you had done a bit of back fitting based on your analysis of results. That makes sense. I think around 90% is possible, that’s my current average on backing o1.5 and ShG but only on 300 actual trades. Not sure that it’ll stay this high, but it doesn’t really matter as long as the price is right.
I basically look at everything from combinations of goals scored/conceded to h2h, what has happened and when as well as current over % with when the last under/0-0 was etc.
Raw data is coming in around 82-83%.
But if any part of what I'm looking at isn't profitable then I won't accept that, hence the difference.
-
@Richard-Latimer I was going to ask if this was a raw spreadsheet or if you had done a bit of back fitting based on your analysis of results. That makes sense. I think around 90% is possible, that’s my current average on backing o1.5 and ShG but only on 300 actual trades. Not sure that it’ll stay this high, but it doesn’t really matter as long as the price is right.
-
@Nick-Segura said in *****New Football Thread*****:
@Richard-Latimer Hey, I am confused, you have a 97% strike rate on the lay under 1.5? Lost 16 trades in over 550 matches? Am I reading your spreadsheet right? This is quite remarkable, to say the least!
You are reading it right but it's theoretical at present unfortunately.
I analyse every single loss in full detail. If I can find a logical reason to remove it from selections I will do so.
Hence all the other tabs informing my decision. I don't believe 97% is possible but I do believe eventually 90%+ will be.
-
@Richard-Latimer Hey, I am confused, you have a 97% strike rate on the lay under 1.5? Lost 16 trades in over 550 matches? Am I reading your spreadsheet right? This is quite remarkable, to say the least!