Aug 2024 £3000 - ? Bank Challenge

[Richard Latimer]

Lay under 1.5 Slutsk @ 5.7
Currently 0-1 HT
Stake £1.97

[Richard Latimer]

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

Lay under 0.5 FH FC Astana @ 4.0

Current ave book price for home team 1.31
Current ave price for FHG 1.29
All stats on filter qualify

Stake £1.97

That was quick. Me likey

Same game. It's 2-1 HT.

Already established home team priced @ 1.31
This is ave price for SHG

My window for 2-1 HT is 1.06+ so qualifies there.

Again all stats from filter qualify for this scoreline so it's a go.

Laying under 3.5 @ 6.2 which is 1.19. 2 ticks better than average book price.

Only the 2nd loss in 58 matches with 2-1 score @ HT. It was bound to happen at some point. Today was the day!

[Richard Latimer]

Lay under 2.5 Fortuna Dusseldorf @ 5.6
Currently 1-1 HT
Stake £1.97

[Richard Latimer]

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

Lay under 0.5 FH FC Astana @ 4.0

Current ave book price for home team 1.31
Current ave price for FHG 1.29
All stats on filter qualify

Stake £1.97

That was quick. Me likey

Same game. It's 2-1 HT.

Already established home team priced @ 1.31
This is ave price for SHG

My window for 2-1 HT is 1.06+ so qualifies there.

Again all stats from filter qualify for this scoreline so it's a go.

Laying under 3.5 @ 6.2 which is 1.19. 2 ticks better than average book price.

[Richard Latimer]

Just had to remove a whole host of games without markets today. Betfair streamlining for the winter leagues it seems.

[Richard Latimer]

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

Lay under 0.5 FH FC Astana @ 4.0

Current ave book price for home team 1.31
Current ave price for FHG 1.29
All stats on filter qualify

Stake £1.97

That was quick. Me likey

[Richard Latimer]

Was getting ready to lay a couple of games in Estonia but no market.

[Richard Latimer]

Lay under 0.5 FH FC Astana @ 4.0

Current ave book price for home team 1.31
Current ave price for FHG 1.29
All stats on filter qualify

Stake £1.97

[Richard Latimer]

Removed a Ukranian game and a Russian game on account of the red list but I am still tracking. Nothing better to do tomorrow than shop and clean so may as well trade as well. Other than that there were some lower league Scottish games (no point as liquidity just trash on Sat 3pm games), a UAE game and another from Tajikstan. Binned those off immediately.

[Richard Latimer]

Latest table so I can keep a sense of optimism for the rest of this month. 2 weekends to go and a lot of work.

[Richard Latimer]

Very annoying day. Hate the fact that EPL is now in the red. Only 7 selections and from that 2 losses. Could however be influenced by the fact I've not played any of the Sat 3pm games yet so we'll see. It's a big league and I'm not removing it without very good reason.

Here are todays results thanks to the toothless Newcastle and Leeds match:

4/6 and a £12.68 loss.

The run of 45 straight LCS came to an end. Would be nice to start another tomorrow and get this stop start month back on track.

[Richard Latimer]

not many FH goals in Netherlands Eerste so far this season. Still Newtown and Newcastle on the radar for what would be around half point loss if they qualify and go green.

[Richard Latimer]

Weiche leaving it stoopidly late but with that goal it SHOULD be a respectable day. Not a winning one but a respectable one.

[Richard Latimer]

Damn you Horn. The run of SHG is over.

[Richard Latimer]

Been having dinner but while I was away 4 trades have materialised. I'll post and explain how I selected these in a bit.

Juniors, Horn, Lyngby & Weiche

[Richard Latimer]

Saudi unmanaged. Leaving those. Another league to do away with.

[A Former User]

@richard-latimer thanks for all your help

[Matt Wood]

@richard-latimer said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

@matt-wood said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

@richard-latimer Intresting stuff Richard, I follow along although most of it goes over my head :).

Quick and probably stupid question, why do you limit the Home goals scored average to 2.7? Is that just a threshold that you have found to be a sweet spot? Just curious as to why you wouldn't just leave that open ended.

Cheers in advance

I looked initially at up to 2.5 I think. The idea being the higher the average isn't always better results. A return to the mean and all that. Then there is the fact that more goals often means higher lay odds. It was about that sweet spot we so often mention.

Then after a while I wanted to see what the actual results showed over this. After 2.7 it becomes/became pretty disappointing and more expensive.

Firstly, higher scoring games at HT seem to do better for SHG with higher scoring averages. My feeling on this is the've already met or beaten the average most times and they're not about to have one of those days in front of goal. A return to the mean can wait for another day.

When the HT scores are low then this can sometimes indicate that the highest of scoring teams are about to have one of those days.

It's just what works from the evidence put in front of me......and there's a lot of evidence building up to be fair. Same with FHG. The higher the average when it goes past a certain point seems to point towards a 0-0 HT rather than a high scoring FH.

That's not to say you won't still get crazy games but there are more hiccups along the way.

Thanks for the reply. I have had similar suspicions forming about some of my data, have lots less than you yet though.

[Richard Latimer]

@matt-wood said in The £59.91 - Betfair Premium Charge Challenge:

@richard-latimer Intresting stuff Richard, I follow along although most of it goes over my head :).

Quick and probably stupid question, why do you limit the Home goals scored average to 2.7? Is that just a threshold that you have found to be a sweet spot? Just curious as to why you wouldn't just leave that open ended.

Cheers in advance

I looked initially at up to 2.5 I think. The idea being the higher the average isn't always better results. A return to the mean and all that. Then there is the fact that more goals often means higher lay odds. It was about that sweet spot we so often mention.

Then after a while I wanted to see what the actual results showed over this. After 2.7 it becomes/became pretty disappointing and more expensive.

Firstly, higher scoring games at HT seem to do better for SHG with higher scoring averages. My feeling on this is the've already met or beaten the average most times and they're not about to have one of those days in front of goal. A return to the mean can wait for another day.

When the HT scores are low then this can sometimes indicate that the highest of scoring teams are about to have one of those days.

It's just what works from the evidence put in front of me......and there's a lot of evidence building up to be fair. Same with FHG. The higher the average when it goes past a certain point seems to point towards a 0-0 HT rather than a high scoring FH.

That's not to say you won't still get crazy games but there are more hiccups along the way.

[Matt Wood]

@richard-latimer Intresting stuff Richard, I follow along although most of it goes over my head :).

Quick and probably stupid question, why do you limit the Home goals scored average to 2.7? Is that just a threshold that you have found to be a sweet spot? Just curious as to why you wouldn't just leave that open ended.

Cheers in advance