Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Football Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
42.9k Posts 268 Posters 3.4m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #28841

    @james-woodroffe said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 that’s interesting cause I have the Olimpia on both my FHG filters and 2nd half Goal and Late goal but the Cerro Porteno Match is on the 2HG and late but not for a FHG.

    ooh yes that game is normally good for goals

    James WoodroffeJ 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28842

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 that’s interesting cause I have the Olimpia on both my FHG filters and 2nd half Goal and Late goal but the Cerro Porteno Match is on the 2HG and late but not for a FHG.

    ? Richard LatimerR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by A Former User
    #28843

    @james-woodroffe said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 sorry if this has been asked before, but do you have a FHG filter that you use to determine your O2.5 trades or is it a O2.5 filter?

    i use over filter but y can use fhg filter take games papertrade and then see what happened
    Cerro Porteno v Guarani (Par) stays on all my filters to have goals there
    but it is south america
    but i am using also filter from footy stats

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28844

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 sorry if this has been asked before, but do you have a FHG filter that you use to determine your O2.5 trades or is it a O2.5 filter?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28845

    @lee-woodman said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 The SR on O1.5 from KO is about 87% and from 30' onwards is about 79%

    You say your SR on O2.5 is 62%.....is that backing from KO?

    yes but i only back between 2.22-3 in the oversmarket
    i found the over 2.5 much easier then the late goals in long run because iin late goals hudge variance when i enter arround the 80th min

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28846

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @lee-woodman said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 The SR on O1.5 from KO is about 87% and from 30' onwards is about 79%

    You say your SR on O2.5 is 62%.....is that backing from KO?

    depends on the starting odds i wait 10 ticks to get in but sometimes when o [email protected] i will lay the unders 3.5 for 0.5 point

    yes arround 62% i need to put still 40 games in excelbut already 37 points up in 15 days i think but i will ex[ect to go down a little

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28847

    @lee-woodman said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 The SR on O1.5 from KO is about 87% and from 30' onwards is about 79%

    You say your SR on O2.5 is 62%.....is that backing from KO?

    depends on the starting odds i wait 10 ticks to get in but sometimes when o [email protected] i will lay the unders 3.5 for 0.5 point

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28848

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 The SR on O1.5 from KO is about 87% and from 30' onwards is about 79%

    You say your SR on O2.5 is 62%.....is that backing from KO?

    ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28849

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @lee-woodman said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @lee-woodman Quite quickly with the value ones but being honest I haven't started backing them yet as I've had so many other opportunities with my correct score trades using o2.5 as insurance.

    That said 10 mins should allow most to hit evens πŸ‘

    @JOHANNES-VAN-LEEUWEN-0 has converted me to the o2.5 market... Using o2.5 goals in a correct score trade only adds to profit rather than erode it and it's working okay for now 🀞

    I'll give the filter another week or 2 to mature and re-evaluate from there

    Ok thanks, ill look further into this. My SH goal filter had a SR of 60/100 O2.5 when backing at 10', 39/68 when backed on 20' and 26/50 on 30'. Interestingly, if there was no goal at 60' then not one went on to hit O2.5 so might be an idea to trade out if no goal and let it run if there has been a goal

    I had started a split stake O1.5 but might switch to O2.5

    over 2.5 is much better do y jnow why when y have 2 fh goals already can cash out 100% roi
    but sometimes i lay u 3.5 because the odds over 2.5 to low but over 1.5 can be good when y have odds arround the 30 th min 1.6-1.7 and stick to it untill the end but for sure y need a strikerate from 80%
    0.80.6100-0.2*100= 28 pounds or euro a game in long run

    over 2.5 my strike rate is 62% 0.621.2100-0.38*100=36.4 EUR a game

    but y can use fhg filter for over 2.5 also then y dripback the over 2.5 when the ko odds are to low like 1.5/2/2.5/3 each 0.25 point

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28850

    @lee-woodman said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @lee-woodman Quite quickly with the value ones but being honest I haven't started backing them yet as I've had so many other opportunities with my correct score trades using o2.5 as insurance.

    That said 10 mins should allow most to hit evens πŸ‘

    @JOHANNES-VAN-LEEUWEN-0 has converted me to the o2.5 market... Using o2.5 goals in a correct score trade only adds to profit rather than erode it and it's working okay for now 🀞

    I'll give the filter another week or 2 to mature and re-evaluate from there

    Ok thanks, ill look further into this. My SH goal filter had a SR of 60/100 O2.5 when backing at 10', 39/68 when backed on 20' and 26/50 on 30'. Interestingly, if there was no goal at 60' then not one went on to hit O2.5 so might be an idea to trade out if no goal and let it run if there has been a goal

    I had started a split stake O1.5 but might switch to O2.5

    over 2.5 is much better do y jnow why when y have 2 fh goals already can cash out 100% roi
    but sometimes i lay u 3.5 because the odds over 2.5 to low but over 1.5 can be good when y have odds arround the 30 th min 1.6-1.7 and stick to it untill the end but for sure y need a strikerate from 80%
    0.80.6100-0.2*100= 28 pounds or euro a game in long run

    over 2.5 my strike rate is 62% 0.621.2100-0.38*100=36.4 EUR a game

    ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28851

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @lee-woodman Quite quickly with the value ones but being honest I haven't started backing them yet as I've had so many other opportunities with my correct score trades using o2.5 as insurance.

    That said 10 mins should allow most to hit evens πŸ‘

    @JOHANNES-VAN-LEEUWEN-0 has converted me to the o2.5 market... Using o2.5 goals in a correct score trade only adds to profit rather than erode it and it's working okay for now 🀞

    I'll give the filter another week or 2 to mature and re-evaluate from there

    Ok thanks, ill look further into this. My SH goal filter had a SR of 60/100 O2.5 when backing at 10', 39/68 when backed on 20' and 26/50 on 30'. Interestingly, if there was no goal at 60' then not one went on to hit O2.5 so might be an idea to trade out if no goal and let it run if there has been a goal

    I had started a split stake O1.5 but might switch to O2.5

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #28852

    ooh nicew norkopping in

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #28853

    Typical Sirius appeared to be dominating the game with Helingsborg not getting a look in and scratched the trade at HT as didn't have any cover for no BTTS and hit target score.

    Focused on Norrkoping match and they couldn't get past 2 goals, okay 3 goals but too late to remove red lol... Ah well onwards and upwards... Still a green day

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to Finn Kristensen on last edited by
    #28854

    @finn-kristensen said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @finn-kristensen said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @james-woodroffe said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    Laid Elfsborg at those odds 1.04 rude not to.

    Getting closer now πŸ˜ƒ

    Bummer... didn't count.

    Yeah would have been interesting πŸ€”πŸ˜‚

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Finn Kristensen on last edited by
    #28855

    @finn-kristensen said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @richard-latimer said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @richard-latimer said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    Both Goteborg and East Riffa behind. Laid.

    Damn you Bahrain!

    Yeah, was on one of my filters as well. Think I will remove Bahrain as a league to trade going forward.

    @Finn-Kristensen

    Having said that, data is almost non existent on this league as either betfair haven't carried the markets on any qualifiers or there were none for a year. Don't think I'm going to get much out of including it so it's gone from future potentials and gone from which I only want to reflect the strategy as it should be.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Finn KristensenF Offline
    Finn KristensenF Offline
    Finn Kristensen
    replied to Finn Kristensen on last edited by
    #28856

    @finn-kristensen said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @james-woodroffe said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    Laid Elfsborg at those odds 1.04 rude not to.

    Getting closer now πŸ˜ƒ

    Bummer... didn't count.

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Finn KristensenF Offline
    Finn KristensenF Offline
    Finn Kristensen
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #28857

    @james-woodroffe said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    Laid Elfsborg at those odds 1.04 rude not to.

    Getting closer now πŸ˜ƒ

    Finn KristensenF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #28858

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    Dangerous attacks: 28 | 131
    all sadd and 0-0
    ooh and goal

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #28859

    Laid Elfsborg at those odds 1.04 rude not to.

    Finn KristensenF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #28860

    Dangerous attacks: 28 | 131
    all sadd and 0-0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.