Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Horse Racing Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Horse Racing
important
6.4k Posts 174 Posters 681.2k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5881

    @richard-latimer said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    LTF

    I notice the last had 3 horse at a price in the 3's. 3 matched. Didn't do it as didn't fit what has been looked at but interesting nonetheless.

    Would be easy enough to look at...maybe in smaller fields look for just 3 to 4 horses within say 3 pts of the fav at a min of >2.9 and set a more aggressive trade point so that if you get 2 then you get a decent return?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5882

    @richard-latimer
    Yes I was thinking of trying that aswell mate, as the earlier you get one matched the more time you have for something else to happen, waiting to drop from 4 to say 1.81,ain’t gonna happen quick but if you have a fav of say 2.5 might hit 1.81 earlier then get drift out and if it wins then so be it, could be interesting

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5883

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    LTF

    I notice the last had 3 horse at a price in the 3's. 3 matched. Didn't do it as didn't fit what has been looked at but interesting nonetheless.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    ? ? ? 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5884

    Nothing really matching yet tonight for LTF

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #5885

    Seems like incredibly slim pickings tonight despite there being 2 meetings

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5886

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    No qualifiers for me tonight but the 20:00 at Tampa currently fits... Will watch it in

    Sorry 1st Fav just come in under 4 so ignore for now

    Yeah annoying. When did it come in?

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #5887

    No qualifiers for me tonight but the 20:00 at Tampa currently fits... Will watch it in

    Sorry 1st Fav just come in under 4 so ignore for now

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #5888

    Did anyone see if the last qualified? It didn't when I looked. @Alan-Steward?

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #5889

    One of the big pieces missing for analysis is that the LIR prices from BF don't seem to be available anywhere that I can find unless you are monitoring the race in real time yourself.

    Makes it really hard to model the P/L of different entry points. If anyone has any success in finding this data for either Aus or US racing would be great to know.

    4 trades overnight in Aus....2 races only 1 hit and 2 races 2 hit at 1.76 so a net -1pt. Still believe that this is close to where you want to be trading.....can't see that needing 3 horses to convert just to get any kind of green is the way to go. Happy to be proven wrong though.

    Nothing hit on my filters at WRD in the US yesterday.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by A Former User
    #5890

    @richard-latimer said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @charles-cartwright Was this Fonner Park? I saw amount traded there was pretty awful last night.

    Yup. They run $5000 claimers there apparently. I had never heard of it but took a look last night. Churchill Downs it aint.

    You would be better off backing the donkeys on Blackpool sands.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5891

    @charles-cartwright Was this Fonner Park? I saw amount traded there was pretty awful last night.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5892

    @keith-dow said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    Evening chaps. It's been a funny one at Buck Rogers Down. I've traded and watched them all. A good few would've matched 3 (sadly I was on a different strategy) and the ones that looked likely never bit.

    Here is who Will Rogers is if you are interested....was a big deal in Okie land back in the day.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Rogers

    The racetrack is on a Cherokee reservation in Oklahoma hence they named it in honor of him.

    There is some really low grade stuff starting up now from Nebraska. Fortunately for you guys it probably doesn't get started until you have gone to bed!

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5893

    Evening chaps. It's been a funny one at Buck Rogers Down. I've traded and watched them all. A good few would've matched 3 (sadly I was on a different strategy) and the ones that looked likely never bit.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to james everard on last edited by
    #5894

    @james-everard said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @richard-latimer Right with you . So because there was all that money matched at 2.0 If never quite managed to fall below that's annoying mate

    Yeah I know. I pondered 2.0 as well but went 1.98 in the end haha!! Could have gone for 2.0 but still been unmatched I guess if there more than £800 queued. 2.02 would have been guaranteed.

    @Alan-Steward still without a proper loser if taking 2.02.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5895

    @richard-latimer Right with you . So because there was all that money matched at 2.0 If never quite managed to fall below that's annoying mate

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5896

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    Yep 1pt loss for me and as the race was on during tea time I didn't measure all other lowest traded price

    Closest after 2.0 was 3.1. I looked at the graphs after.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to james everard on last edited by
    #5897

    @james-everard said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @richard-latimer I was taking Charles advice as he is testing around the 1.7 mark only a small loss though which I can accept. So you got matched at 1.98 if so I wonder what the lowest the 2nd place got to must have been around 1.85 mark ?

    No, there was the winner @ 1.01 obv and 2nd place @ 2.00. Missed it by a tick.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Angus MacleodA Offline
    Angus MacleodA Offline
    Angus Macleod
    wrote on last edited by
    #5898

    Same here gents, was sure this was going to get 2 matched but no joy

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5899

    Yep 1pt loss for me and as the race was on during tea time I didn't measure all other lowest traded price

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5900

    @richard-latimer I was taking Charles advice as he is testing around the 1.7 mark only a small loss though which I can accept. So you got matched at 1.98 if so I wonder what the lowest the 2nd place got to must have been around 1.85 mark ?

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.