Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Horse Racing Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Horse Racing
important
6.4k Posts 174 Posters 681.2k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5441

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @richard-latimer ??? Lol

    Fave a little short on this one but will monitor for excluding fave it doesn't get back to 4.0

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5442

    @richard-latimer ??? Lol

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5443

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    3 matched in the 19:15 for me as well 👍

    Three low traded prices in that one

    The winner which curiously only traded at 1.03 then 1.36 and 1.12.

    Saw the price of fave came in but went out again momentarily. Did it first come under 4.0 in the last 5 mins?

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5444

    3 matched in the 19:15 for me as well 👍

    Three low traded prices in that one

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5445

    3 matched in 7.15 at 1.81

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #5446

    Well the 19:15 looks primed for LTF so fingers crossed.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5447

    @keith-dow sorry to hear this. Will look forward to your return in due course mate.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5448

    @keith-dow Stay safe mate, you will be missed... Feel free to keep in touch 👍

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5449

    @keith-dow Sorry to hear this a valued member of the community. Hope all is ok with you , stay safe buddy and hope things pick up for you and return in the near future

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5450

    @keith-dow
    Sorry to hear that Keith, hope everything is ok and gets sorted mate.look forward to you returning later in the year 👍

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5451

    Hi guys, unfortunately I am going to have to take some time away from the community. I've a couple of things going on and feel I can't give it the focus and attention it deserves.
    I do hope to be back when the dust settles a bit (hopefully after summer). I want to thank you all for the help, support, tips laughs and education I received here. It won't be forgotten (which is why re-signing is high on the priority list when things change).
    Take care yourselves and all the very best with your trading.

    ? J ? Richard LatimerR 4 Replies Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5452

    @alan-steward Enjoy , I have been for a nice long walk lunchtime trying to start a daily exercise regime as I have put on far too much weight since the gym shut.
    I had a quick look no money traded on the last French race Compiegne , it didn't meet the criteria due to the length of the race but noticed the race goes inplay but no video coverage and the odds had extremely slow movement even inplay. Will be following with no money to be traded for a few days and see if the liquidity picks up and hopefully the odds will move quicker then. For the time being I will be trading the usa Markets this evening looks like two meetings this evening and if the criteria is met will be trading just £2 stakes.

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5453

    Right am off to the allotment, catch you guys later... Am managing to get my bot to capture more in race data so getting there lol

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5454

    Lowest traded price 1.01 next closest 3.0??? Glad I was in simulation mode lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5455

    @richard-latimer Yep looking much better now... Got the bot running but am watching odds live as I wanted to check the pace of monies being traded

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5456

    @alan-steward it's not too bad

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5457

    @richard-latimer Not a lot of liquidity though mate and in play action is key to getting more than one selection matched... Maybe it will pick up in the next 10mins 👍

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5458

    @charles-cartwright Hi Charles, where can we find this data... Is it easily available to all online or is this info from another membership site... Cheers

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5459

    I mentioned a while ago that I am working on discovering what if any angles can be used to deploy LTF once racing resumes in UK/IE. Still going through the masses of data but I can share with you this piece that shows the futility of using a set-point for your trades anywhere close to even money.

    I looked at every flat race run in the UK/IE for 2019 that had at least 6 runners, 4222 of them to be exact. Then I looked at what the LIR was for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th place finishers in each of those races and calculated the P/L for two simple entry points....1.99 and 1.31.

    Of course will no selection criteria applied both of them were net losers but it illustrated clearly what you need to be looking at.

    Of the 4,222 races: 1,520 had only one horse (the winner) trading less than 2.0, 2,265 had 2 horses trading less than 2.0, 407 had 3 horses and 30 had 4 horses. Your net loss if you laid at 1.99 would have been -1,053 pts.

    Of the 4,222 races: 3,324 had only 1 horses trading at 1.31 or lower, 869 had 2 at that price, 28 had 3, and 1 had 4. Net loss trading at 1.31 would have been -338.6 pts.

    The point here is that you can't turn that first concept into a winning one no matter what you do.

    Will be back when I finished my complete analysis but I believe that course and distance filters are going to be the key and that potentially using two entry points to maximize the positive side of winning trades whilst maintaining steady liability will be the way to go.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #5460

    That said, the 13:35 looks like it may be good

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=v8arsy1si4v0651ser69coa45&st=4r1o63le&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.