Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

*****New Football Thread*****

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
important
4.7k Posts 103 Posters 67.1k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mick mcmahon
    replied to Akiva Anderson on last edited by
    #721

    @Akiva-Anderson good info. I am terrible at keeping spreadsheets up to date so wrote some code to parse a days results from sofascore. And store that in a database. Going to write some more code so I can click on a match and record a bet...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva Anderson
    wrote on last edited by
    #722

    A few stats from the Premier League matches so far:

    General Stats:

    Games Played: 59
    Home Wins: 20 (34%)
    Draws: 18 (31%)
    Away Wins: 21 (36%)
    Total Goals: 166 (2.81)

    Over / Under:

    Over 0.5 Goals: 57 (97%)
    Over 1.5 Goals: 50 (85%)
    Over 2.5 Goals: 32 (54%)

    Goals by Half:

    Over 0.5 1H Goals: 47 (80%)
    Over 1.5 1H Goals: 21 (36%)

    Over 0.5 2H Goals: 51 (86%)
    Over 1.5 2H Goals: 21 (36%)

    le jeu avant tout

    Am Yisrael Chai

    When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
    But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game...

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Arran Shackell on last edited by
    #723

    @Arran-Shackell probably more due to Spurs Jekyll and Hyde nature!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Arran Shackell
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #724

    @Martin

    Hills had Utd priced just under EVS just before kick off!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva Anderson
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #725

    @Martin said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    @Greg-Mitchell said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    backed Ten Haag to be next prem manager to leave at HT he was odds of 4, traded out at FT for nice profit odds of 1.8

    I said in the podcast he should be sacked last week after watching them play out a 0-0 at Palace and not try to score at the end was pathetic. I'm amazed Utd fans aren't more up in arms

    Give him a 10 year contract please!

    le jeu avant tout

    Am Yisrael Chai

    When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
    But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Greg Mitchell on last edited by
    #726

    @Greg-Mitchell said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    backed Ten Haag to be next prem manager to leave at HT he was odds of 4, traded out at FT for nice profit odds of 1.8

    I said in the podcast he should be sacked last week after watching them play out a 0-0 at Palace and not try to score at the end was pathetic. I'm amazed Utd fans aren't more up in arms

    Akiva AndersonA A 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Arran Shackell
    wrote on last edited by
    #727

    This thread has been very quiet recently. Has everyone had a good weekend?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg Mitchell
    wrote on last edited by
    #728

    backed Ten Haag to be next prem manager to leave at HT he was odds of 4, traded out at FT for nice profit odds of 1.8

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #729

    @Richard-Latimer I mean they are usually very good on NI games

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #730

    @Martin Random s**t that makes no sense is very like them.

    I'm not spreading my money around but I wanted to lay Coleraine.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #731

    @Richard-Latimer not like them is it!

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #732

    So only 1 Northern Ireland game on betfair today. Bit annoying

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Simon BatesS Offline
    Simon BatesS Offline
    Simon Bates
    replied to Shannon Townsend on last edited by
    #733

    @Shannon-Townsend cashed out at half time, too early 😞😂
    ![alt text](image urlScreenshot_20240925_213536_Exchange.jpg )

    1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Shannon Townsend
    wrote on last edited by
    #734

    Anyone else's eyes light up when Liverpool went 1 nil down tonight... odds went to 2.2 for Liverpool win and was green and on a free bet within 4 mins...took the profit at 2-1... if Carlsberg did in play trades...

    Simon BatesS 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #735

    Thanks for all the replies. Loads of stuff to think about there.

    @Richard-Latimer Totally agree with you about starting with the stats before leagues. I only had a look at it the other way around to shut the little voice in my head up. Whilst it did produce some interesting results, it doesn't make sense.

    @Alex-Rendell Averaging around 200 selections per month at the moment. The initial set was very broad and was just an idea I had that I did not really expect much from. Funny how things go when you look at the numbers though. Rolling seasons seems like a good idea, I'll steal that too.

    @Stuart-Capstick Evening Stuart, Ive always had in mind that if I can get a solid LTD out of this then SHG trades would be possible if the games are drawing at HT. I am mindful, like you say, that this is only 1 seasons worth of data and would like to have another to back it up and see if the trends follow year to year. Interestingly I had a look at the losing selections and it seems like a BTD could be possible from this data too.

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Stuart Capstick
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #736

    @Matt-Wood

    Hi Matt,

    Well done on finding something with LTD. It really isn't dead; the draw is the hardest to predict, so prices are often wrong, which is lovely for those who trade the draw.

    Maybe:

    1. Each league needs its own strategy. The Irish league is very different to Brazil Serie A. It wouldn't be so outlandish if the draw was more likely under certain circumstances in one league as opposed to others.

    2. Have a look at other outcomes- FHG, SHG, O2.5 etc
      So many times for me a " failed" LTD turned out to be fruitful for SHG or laying the home team.

    3. Be mindful that you have only one season's data. Sometimes leagues have blips.
      BUT- FHG and SHG tend to resist those seasonal variations.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alex Rendell
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #737

    @Matt-Wood if you want to send me your spreadsheet or results etc to see if I can see things from another angle then feel free!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alex Rendell
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #738

    @Matt-Wood 1500 is decent! I'd say once you get in excess of 5000 then you can really start to drill into the individual leagues and see what works and what doesn't. Until then, perhaps a more broad approach would be best? I'd definitely look to filter odds ranges at the top and bottom ends though as a starting point, as opposed to leaving out say odds of 3.4 because they're showing a loss, whereas 3.35 and 3.45 both show profit, so they don't get removed. It just doesn't make sense.

    How many selections are you averaging per month? If it's a fair amount then surely just aim for maximum profit over ROI? Tough call that one though.

    I think 3-5 seasons' worth of data is good, anything older just doesn't feel relevant anymore. I only look at the past 3 seasons data personally, and keep that rolling so it's never more than 3 seasons old, if that makes sense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #739

    @Matt-Wood said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    Afternoon all.

    Just wondering if any of you suffer from 'analysis paralysis' at all and if yes how and what do you do to move past it?

    I ask since I am struggling with it now. I had an idea for a LTD (even though the internet says its dead 🙄 ) for the summer leagues since I don't do much in the summer.

    I have collected a fair amount of data now and just betting every game blind it has made 50pts.
    I know with a couple of sensible tweaks to the data that return can double. The problem I am stuck with now is that I have become obsessed with maximising the return and therefor won't commit to making the change.

    For example if I apply a couple of filters to the data Ireland is in good profit for the summer but with a couple of different filters it is in a slight loss. This is reversed for other leagues. Repeat this over and over across multiple attempts and I have become stuck with trying to find a way to extract the maximum winning leagues in one go, even though I know there is probably not a 'best' way.

    Just curious as to how others find their way through this sort of thing.

    Cheers in advance.

    I know others have said tailor your approach to each league independently. I'm sure that works but for me it's way too much and I would find it overcomplication on mine.

    When I look to optimise any filter I have I never look at what this does to a particular league. If the overall improves and the league is looking sub standard then it's the league which will hold my concerns.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #740

    In terms of what I filter first it's always the stats. Stats is logical. When I can't find any reasonable change to the stats and I'm still not happy that's when I'll look at removing poor leagues.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.