Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

*****New Football Thread*****

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
important
4.7k Posts 103 Posters 67.0k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AdamA Offline
    AdamA Offline
    Adam btc team
    replied to Martin on last edited by Adam
    #2601

    @Martin said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    @Arran-Shackell

    @Adam is on the case!

    It's back as of around 18:15.

    This issue has been a persistant thorn in my side this last couple of weeks (and everyone else's, I realise!) due to it not being picked up on our monitoring tools.

    Good news is, I have sorted it πŸ™‚

    BTC's Website and Software Man

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Arran Shackell on last edited by
    #2602

    @Arran-Shackell

    @Adam is on the case!

    AdamA 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Arran Shackell
    wrote on last edited by
    #2603

    @Martin @Ryan

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Joseph Henderson
    replied to Arran Shackell on last edited by
    #2604

    @Arran-Shackell Same here - getting 502 Gateway error message

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Arran Shackell
    wrote on last edited by
    #2605

    Is it my connection or is the stats software down?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #2606

    Finally getting off the mark for 2024. Lay under 1.5:

    f3bb49bd-42a9-453e-a925-6aee78deb4fc-image.png

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva Anderson
    wrote on last edited by
    #2607

    Home Wins:

    Fulham v Rotherham (FA CUP) - Fulham win at 1.22. Not great odds, but Rotherham are fighting relegation and they concede a lot

    Sporting v Estoril. Tight at the top. Expect Sporting to win here. Odds are 1.26

    le jeu avant tout

    Am Yisrael Chai

    When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
    But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Aaron Rouse
    replied to Mark Maguire on last edited by
    #2608

    @Mark-Maguire Thanks for your reply.

    Your explanation makes perfect sense and completely understand now.

    Much appreciated!

    Aaron

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Maguire
    replied to Aaron Rouse on last edited by
    #2609

    @Aaron-Rouse welcome ! Simple answer is that there is no difference other than your attitude towards risk and reward ..

    If you back under 3.5 goals (for an example the Palace vs Everton game tonight) the odds are 1.33 so for a Β£10 stake the return would be Β£3.30 on a straight bet.

    If you lay over 3.5 the odds are 4.1 so a ten pounds stake would make the liability Β£31.00 (to win Β£10) or to make the same return Β£3.30 the risk would Β£10.23 -

    Its really down to personal preference which way you go. Hope this makes sense.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Aaron Rouse
    wrote on last edited by
    #2610

    Hi All,
    I am new to trading, and was wondering...what is the difference between laying over 3.5 goals and backing under 3.5 goals.
    Thanks

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Maguire
    wrote on last edited by
    #2611

    Nice little day to day

    LTD

    Partick vs Queens Parkβœ…
    Rangers vs Kilmarnockβœ…

    02.5 Split Stake out after 60 mins if no goal

    Morton vs Ayrβœ…
    Arbroath vs Dundee Utdβœ…

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Maguire
    replied to Tony Hastie on last edited by
    #2612

    @Tony-Hastie I am looking for match action in previous games which suggests an early goal in the game .. it started with filters looking for what I think leads to goals rather than goals themselves and then when I studied the data I saw that first goal times were roughly as follows: first 15 mins 35%. next fifteen mins 23% , next fifteen mins 17% (so 75% FHG) then 9% up to 60 mins .. then it drops to 11% for the last half hour and 5% no goal which led to me work out an early entry point and staking - I sometimes trade FHG on these too if my stats say the % FHG is above 94% on the probabilities I calculate .

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Tony Hastie
    replied to Mark Maguire on last edited by
    #2613

    @Mark-Maguire The Partick game has come up in my FHG filter which got me thinking....Are you basically looking for a FHG in your 1.5 and 2.5 strategies? Then trading out? Or is that over simplifying things a bit?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Maguire
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #2614

    Just a couple today

    LTD

    Partick vs Queens Park
    Rangers vs Kilmarnock (if odds come in)

    02.5 Split Stake out after 60 mins if no goal

    Morton vs Ayr
    Arbroath vs Dundee Utd

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Maguire
    wrote on last edited by Mark Maguire
    #2615

    Nice start to the year with full house on these and other trades

    LTD

    Bolton vs Burtonβœ…
    Leicester vs Huddersfield: βœ…

    01.5 Split Stake Out after 70 if no goal

    Chesterfield vs Solihullβœ…
    Liverpool vs Newcastleβœ…

    02.5 Split Stake out after 60 if no goal

    Tranmere vs Notts Countyβœ…
    Crawley vs Swindonβœ…

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Matt Hyam
    replied to Matt Hyam on last edited by
    #2616

    Tranmere v Notts Co ❌️ odds didn't come in so no trade luckily
    Blackburn v Rotherham βœ…οΈ
    Crawley v Swindon βœ…οΈ
    Plymouth v Watford ❌️

    Not the best start to the year but did have a good run over the Christmas week so probably due a bad day.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Matt Hyam
    replied to Mark Maguire on last edited by
    #2617

    @Mark-Maguire currently have Tranmere v Notts Co for under 2.5 FHG

    Also have the below
    Blackburn v Rotherham
    Crawley v Swindon
    Plymouth v Watford

    Looking for minimum odds of 1.2

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark Maguire
    wrote on last edited by
    #2618

    Ok a couple for me today :

    LTD

    Bolton vs Burton
    Leicester vs Huddersfield

    01.5 Split Stake Out after 70 if no goal

    Chesterfield vs Solihull
    Liverpool vs Newcastle

    02.5 Split Stake out after 60 if no goal

    Tranmere vs Notts County
    Crawley vs Swindon

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris KingC Offline
    Chris KingC Offline
    Chris King
    wrote on last edited by
    #2619

    Seems to be good value on the Sheff Wed v Hull match today going by BTC stats/Betfair goal markets, unless I’m missing something.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alastair Todd
    wrote on last edited by
    #2620

    That sense of anticipation when you've cut and pasted the 2023 spreadsheets across to a new 2024 spreadsheet (keeping all the formatting and percentage columns etc).

    Good luck in 2024 everybody. Glad to be a part of this community. Bring it on!

    1 Reply Last reply
    7

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.