Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
350 Posts 32 Posters 36.6k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Matt Wood
    #81

    @james-rome I have not tracked that, will do more closely now, but I'm not surprised since the filter looks for slow starting teams.

    Just added it to my current 2 round of testing and its a 74.59% SHG, Not really quite high enough for trading for me. Worth keeping an eye on it though 👍

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    i dont have numbers on this not sure anyone will but seems to be alot of shg goals with these

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #83

    @stuart-wallace said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Supersport United v Chippa was a win

    RZESZOW and SANDECJA were also wins.

    So, first 4 on todays list were wins

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Supersport United v Chippa was a win

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #85

    @chris-osborne it's also stated in the first line of the opening post 😄

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #86

    @stuart-wallace said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @keith said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Sorry for the off topic post guys but I see a few people mention “keiths list”? Which thread is this under please?

    Oh, Hi Keith. I notice you are a new member - welcome ....its good in 'ere.
    Mostly, when people talk about 'Keith' its Keith Anderson, who is a long time trader and posts his (generally) Lay U1.5 goals daily on here ... and is quite successful (through experience of following him!) He posts on the general Football trading thred - he has one there for today.
    Welcome onboard BTW , its a good place to be .

    Thanks for the warm welcome Stuart much appreciated mate I shall check out the general thread mate thanks again!
    I'm liking this forum a lot in my short time being a member 😊

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #87

    @martin said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @darragh-moran said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne I was backing it all weekend for that reason. Was away so couldn't really in play trade, am a new member.

    In fairness if I had a penny for every time I have said to always test a strategy yourself before backing it, especially someone elses, I would be a rich man!

    I had noticed that 😄

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #88

    @keith said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Sorry for the off topic post guys but I see a few people mention “keiths list”? Which thread is this under please?

    Oh, Hi Keith. I notice you are a new member - welcome ....its good in 'ere.
    Mostly, when people talk about 'Keith' its Keith Anderson, who is a long time trader and posts his (generally) Lay U1.5 goals daily on here ... and is quite successful (through experience of following him!) He posts on the general Football trading thred - he has one there for today.
    Welcome onboard BTW , its a good place to be .

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Sorry for the off topic post guys but I see a few people mention “keiths list”? Which thread is this under please?

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #90

    @darragh-moran said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne I was backing it all weekend for that reason. Was away so couldn't really in play trade, am a new member.

    In fairness if I had a penny for every time I have said to always test a strategy yourself before backing it, especially someone elses, I would be a rich man!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #91

    First one of today was a winner - Bucheon 0-0. I bolstered my bank by £1.32.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #92

    @paul-benstead-0 said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @martin said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne good point maybe I should remove it, the reason it was added is everyone wanted the filter, most demanded one ever!

    Why not have an Under Test section? That way, members can test them as well so having lots of input.

    yes, i like this too, at least its clear and can be utilised if you want.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #93

    @chris-osborne said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @stuart-wallace said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne Yep, me too. I dipped just under the 1.65 yesterday for Voz game, purely as an experiment with minimum stake.
    Yes, i also saw the Supersport game and thought i would keep an eye on that one, not sure how many i am going to do today.

    Supersport is at 1.49 there are a few with low odds

    yes, i saw that. One of those games where you would give it a swerve. i'm going to watch the game though to monitor the IPS, as i have a particular interest in the SA league after having lived there for a number of years, so might have an edge in some things.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #94

    @paul-benstead-0 said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @martin said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne good point maybe I should remove it, the reason it was added is everyone wanted the filter, most demanded one ever!

    Why not have an Under Test section? That way, members can test them as well so having lots of input.

    I like this idea

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #95

    @martin said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne good point maybe I should remove it, the reason it was added is everyone wanted the filter, most demanded one ever!

    Why not have an Under Test section? That way, members can test them as well so having lots of input.

    ? Stuart WallaceS 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #96

    @chris-osborne good point maybe I should remove it, the reason it was added is everyone wanted the filter, most demanded one ever!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    On todays selections for example you can reduce by over 50% the volume by using a min odds criteria how many people will go with everything regardless of odds.

    Its a good strategy and you use at your own risk as with anything but this weekend highlighted to me that you need to be strict with your own personal selection criteria -Over 40 games on Saturday and 20+ on sunday is alot for most bankrolls when starting out

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #98

    @darragh-moran said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne I was backing it all weekend for that reason. Was away so couldn't really in play trade, am a new member.

    thats exactly my point new members are going to see it and think its fully tested

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #99

    @chris-osborne I was backing it all weekend for that reason. Was away so couldn't really in play trade, am a new member.

    ? MartinM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #100

    @martin said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @darragh-moran said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @frances-white given this information, is it still worth using this strategy for the rest of this season do people think?

    can only speak for myself but as it's still in testing I won't be putting money on it anyway at the moment

    @Martin with all due respect if its uploaded in the Profitible Members section it should be fully tested as people are going to trade anything in there if it fits with what they want to do

    ? MartinM 2 Replies Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.