Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
350 Posts 32 Posters 36.6k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz Hutchinson
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #41

    @matt-wood Ha ha! Yes I find that, I can tweak things after every weekend and it can make recent data better - but if it's variance then it makes older data worse - and I never know where to stop. Every now and then I hit a good idea though that works for all matches to date.

    I think I need a back up dim stool, mine's very worn out now!😄

    Gaz

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Gaz Hutchinson on last edited by Matt Wood
    #42

    @gaz-hutchinson Sorry line 4 to 0.6 and line 2 to 0.8 is what I just looked at.

    However this is only on recent data, my all time sheet, from mid Dec, this makes it worse 🙂 This is about where I get stuck in testing things.

    I will go and fetch my Dim Stool 😆

    Catch that Green!

    Gaz HutchinsonG 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz Hutchinson
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by Gaz Hutchinson
    #43

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    dropping line for to a max of 0.6

    Which line? 🙂

    Can play around for ages with these, very interesting isn't it!!

    Gaz

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Gaz Hutchinson on last edited by Matt Wood
    #44

    @gaz-hutchinson No probs. I have only ever had down to England National on my testing but seem to do well.

    The lines on the filter I mention seem to be a little fluid. Ive just looked again now and dropping line 4 to a max of 0.6 has seen improvement now. Combine this with dropping the line 2 to a max of 0.8 has seen a near 4% increase in strike rate.
    I keep wondering where the best spot is and cannot decide.

    This is only on data from 8th march. On my all time sheet its best at 1.4.

    Catch that Green!

    Gaz HutchinsonG 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz Hutchinson
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #45

    @martin
    Last 2 weekends just England Saturday 3pm games stats:

    Sat 2nd April. 28 games 3pm kick off £87.00 profit to £10 stakes !
    Sat 9 April. 18 games £54.70 profit

    Gaz

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz Hutchinson
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #46

    @matt-wood Great - thanks for the confirmation. I thought it made sense to have those filters set that way, didn't quite understand the way I had them, also see my post to Martin below about the England Leagues I've been monitoring!
    They seem to be bucking the April trend big time so far!

    "I don't know if you are still monitoring them, but I am monitoring ALL the England League matches the filter throws up (and you removed the 3pm kick offs) and since 26 March - 10th April there has been a £205.50 profit to £10 stakes for 68 games including all kick off times. It is worth adding all England matches back into your data to monitor them. 3 weekends so far since I started my spreadsheet, all profitable.
    This weekend 9/10 April were 20 games and £53.60 profit to £10 stakes, ALL those games were 3pm except one at 2pm.

    Almost every countries leagues have taken a huge tumble, but NOT England yet"

    Gaz

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Gaz Hutchinson on last edited by
    #47

    @gaz-hutchinson Evening Gaz. Don't apologise, I am regularly sat on the 'Dim Stool' myself 🙂

    You have it correct. I was referring to lines 2 and 4 of the filter (the ones you pointed out).

    My testing has taken a hit. Since April 1st I am 1.5pts down. However, League 1 and 2 from England are rocking some profit :).

    Catch that Green!

    Gaz HutchinsonG 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Gaz Hutchinson on last edited by
    #48

    @gaz-hutchinson interesting to note!

    Gaz HutchinsonG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz Hutchinson
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #49

    @martin I don't know if you are still monitoring them, but I am monitoring ALL the England League matches the filter throws up (and you removed the 3pm kick offs) and since 26 March - 10th April there has been a £205.50 profit to £10 stakes for 68 games including all kick off times. It is worth adding all England matches back into your data to monitor them. 3 weekends so far since I started my spreadsheet, all profitable.
    This weekend 9/10 April were 20 games and £53.60 profit to £10 stakes, ALL those games were 3pm except one at 2pm.

    Almost every countries leagues have taken a huge tumble, but NOT England yet. 😄

    Gaz

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz HutchinsonG Offline
    Gaz Hutchinson
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #50

    @matt-wood Hi Matt, sorry if I'm being a bit dim but please can you clarify what this part of the post means?

    "A little while back I posted my filter settings as they are slightly different to Martin's testing.
    Line 2 is set to a max of 1.0 and line 4 is set to a max of 1.2"

    ie what does Line 2, and LIne 4 refer to?
    Is it these lines ie filter 2 and 4 below, that need changing?
    Copy of filter as I currently have it set up:

    0_1649780143260_22abd736-71a8-4b7f-a1c1-2987b0bcfa4a-image.png

    So Home Goals Conceded should be set to "less than or=1.0" and away Goals Conceded should be set to "less than or =1.20"?

    That makes a lot of sense to me but not sure if that's what you mean by lines 2 and 4.

    Also those leagues look better to me than Martin's, especially as he removed England 3pm kickoffs and actually all the filter chosen England matches (68 games) since 26 Mach have given a £205.50 profit to £10 stakes for me.

    Sorry again if I'm being dim 😄

    Gaz

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    The April/May goal effect is real isn't it!

    Gaz HutchinsonG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #52

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @chris-osborne said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @stuart-wallace don’t forget the summer leagues especially South America. This wouldn’t be a good strategy for Norway or Sweden but could have potential in the likes of Brazil/Argentina.

    As Matt says though need data on the summer leagues before using own money

    Agreed, Scandinavian leagues would be poor most likely. Might have some joy in the Japanese and Korean leagues. Data needed first though.

    Japan and Korea must be close to hitting filters, some South American leagues also although Brazil only started this weekend

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #53

    @chris-osborne said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @stuart-wallace don’t forget the summer leagues especially South America. This wouldn’t be a good strategy for Norway or Sweden but could have potential in the likes of Brazil/Argentina.

    As Matt says though need data on the summer leagues before using own money

    Agreed, Scandinavian leagues would be poor most likely. Might have some joy in the Japanese and Korean leagues. Data needed first though.

    Catch that Green!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #54

    @keith said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @stuart-wallace said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood I'm almost viewing this as a Nov to Mar strat. Nov so we've got plenty of games under our belt, and Mar to avoid the apparent APR/May rise in goals.

    If we had enough data maybe this could switch to an OVER 2.5 goal strategy for April/May?

    Yes it could work that way, just need the info before trying it out.

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #55

    @stuart-wallace said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood I'm almost viewing this as a Nov to Mar strat. Nov so we've got plenty of games under our belt, and Mar to avoid the apparent APR/May rise in goals.

    If we had enough data maybe this could switch to an OVER 2.5 goal strategy for April/May?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lee Leadbetter
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @lee-leadbetter Yea its had a bit of a turn. I would probably get a years info really before trading real money on it. That way you can see any potential seasonal cycles in the different leagues.

    Ye definitely need more data in regards to longevity over a season etc.
    I have added in to my filter Avg Ovr Total Goals per game, this gives another angle to look at. For example seen Levante v Barcelona on the list but the Avg goals was 3.2 per game. Was 0-0 HT but 2-3 FT.
    I think tracking the HT scores on my sheet would be beneficial also.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by A Former User
    #57

    @stuart-wallace don’t forget the summer leagues especially South America. This wouldn’t be a good strategy for Norway or Sweden but could have potential in the likes of Brazil/Argentina.

    As Matt says though need data on the summer leagues before using own money

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #58

    @matt-wood I'm almost viewing this as a Nov to Mar strat. Nov so we've got plenty of games under our belt, and Mar to avoid the apparent APR/May rise in goals.

    ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Lee Leadbetter on last edited by
    #59

    @lee-leadbetter Yea its had a bit of a turn. I would probably get a years info really before trading real money on it. That way you can see any potential seasonal cycles in the different leagues.

    Catch that Green!

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lee Leadbetter
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    This hasnt half taken a hit since the turn of the month. I was ready to go in with real stakes on this one.

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.