Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Set & Forget Football Strategies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
important
1.8k Posts 143 Posters 220.9k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to Martin on last edited by Nick Allan
    #241

    @Martin Same, also looking at home odds and league positions of both teams to see if there is any correlation there

    nickN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #242

    @Martin Yeh had a look at your spreadsheet too to see if it correlated with my data. Looks like the SR does jump 6 percentage points in your data as well by removing under 3.25.

    Think it had a very small profit under 3.25 in your data but profit per trade on those was so small that may still be worth removing. Definitely one to monitor for a bit longer tho.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Andy Donnelly on last edited by
    #243

    @Andy-Donnelly good work! I'm still testing all odds below 5.8 nearly a years data so I'll do a deep dive end of Jan can't wait!

    A N 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #244

    Doing a bit of analysis on the Lay Away today. The data I have is suggesting that the bottom odds should be more like 3.25 rather than 2.48.

    SR jumps 6 percentage points when you remove those below 3.25.

    Going to monitor until end of November and if data continues that way will make change. This change would also reduces a little, the number of selections which can be pretty crazy particularly on the weekends, which is probably not a bad thing.

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • MartinM Martin pinned this topic on
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to GREGORIOS KARASHIALIS on last edited by
    #245

    @GREGORIOS-KARASHIALIS here is a video step by step guide 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    GREGORIOS KARASHIALIS
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #246

    @Martin HI MARTIN, i am struggerling to add these filters?

    when i go to sav, export, apply

    i get lost

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Andy Donnelly on last edited by A Former User
    #247

    @Andy-Donnelly Yeah, I was thinking about adding an away points per game < 1 potentially. At the minute, I am taking all games that are on the normal filter and then adding a comment as to why I am/am not trading it.

    It might be that the filter doesn't need it and it still works out as profit in the long run. However I will record all the results, regardless of whether I back the selection or not. From that point, I will be able to see whether my choice was right/wrong or whether a filter needs tweaking.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to alexander hughes on last edited by
    #248

    @alexander-hughes Yep agreed, I do that myself. Sometimes you find selections where the odds are there to trade but just have had very little money matched and probably why they don’t pull through on the software immediately

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    alexander hughes
    replied to Andy Donnelly on last edited by
    #249

    @Andy-Donnelly It's better to remove the odds from BTC filters anyway and filter yourself or using automation software.

    The reason is that the odds change which makes the selections change. The selections via BTC won't change if it isn't comparing odds so you'll get everything that otherwise qualifies and won't have different results depending on the time you checked BTC.

    Obviously if you don't have automation software to filter on odds conditions that might be a proper pain though.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    💯
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to Andy Donnelly on last edited by
    #250

    Just added myself 😜

    I have also cloned the filter and removed the criteria on home odds. Makes no sense having that. After all you are laying the away team within a certain odds range. If home odds happens to be shorter than 1.7 then don’t see a reason why you wouldn’t trade it.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #251

    @Joe-Beeston Nice observation. I reckon it’s worth adding an away points criteria as an informational column of data I.e greater than or equal to zero. Would probably be helpful in researching

    A ? 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #252

    Yes, you can't just blindly follow the filters, I made that mistake at first. Essentially the software allows you to use statistics to see if there is value in the prices. There is a chance that the statistics will give a selection, that still isn't value. Like Ryan says, it allows you to be a sniper, not scatter gunning.

    Today is a prime example, on the Lay The Away there is Turkgucu vs Vilzing. The filter has pulled it through as Turkgucu are strong at home AVG > 2 pts; however if you look into the fixture, Vilzing are amazing away (Won 8 out of 10). Now the selection may win, but I am avoiding it as Vilzing are mega strong away. Shows that blindly following the selections might not work.

    Also asks the question, does the away points per game need to be added, but you will only know by testing 🙂

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    💯
    3
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    wrote on last edited by
    #253

    I am paper trading loads of systems (mainly set and forgets), and wish i had done this from day 1 when i joined could of saved an absolute fortune.
    In fact i find it quite interesting recording the data ( i know boring old git lol). If feel so much relaxed knowing that i will only start trading with money once i know it is profitable over a few months.
    Several of the systems have been performing well over the summer leagues but finding some are not so good so far on the winter leagues. That is why it is good not to put hard earned cash on anything until proven long term.

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #254

    @Martin When i do the research. Im writing down what I'm thinking prematch and if I would of bet on the match or not. Its great when you avoid some losers. Still feel like a need to be more selective tho.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #255

    @Andrew-Dobinson spot on you start to become your own trader and really learn the game! The experience is invaluable long term

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #256

    I used to think set and forget was only that. Get the selections from the software and job done. Finally got my backside in to gear and researched each selection. Its not about getting on every winner its about trying to avoid the losers. Makes to big difference long term. Only paper trading for now. While i get used to researching, what best to look for etc. I know its part of the Ryans super trader program. But actually doing it really opens your eyes.

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #257

    @Michal-Sebik see Adam's post in the football thread from yesterday re reuploaded matches https://forum.betfairtradingcommunity.com/topic/4341/new-football-thread/19?_=1696750168500

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #258

    @Michal-Sebik Oxford United and Inter Turku games

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Andy Donnelly on last edited by
    #259

    @Andy-Donnelly which were these? I am slightly in loss today.. but I am doing both Martin and yours.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #260

    @Michal-Sebik Yeh when I say not many selections, I mean those that hit the odds range. Got 2 today though and both winners at big prices

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.