Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Set & Forget Football Strategies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
important
1.8k Posts 143 Posters 220.9k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Arran Shackell on last edited by
    #361

    @Arran-Shackell yeah will get plenty of days like that straight laying odds against, nature of the beast!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Arran Shackell
    wrote on last edited by
    #362

    lay away had a bit of an overnight hammering

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #363

    @Fearghal-Downes hard to say as this doesn't cover selections does it but all matches

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #364

    I used a tool to see which leagues the favorite wins most in at odds from 1.01 to 1.7 over the last 2 seasons. (this is the lay away 1.0 method in reverse)

    In the image are the leagues that it gave me.
    Is it a good idea to select ONLY these leagues in the lay away 1.0 method?

    alt text

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Alex Rendell on last edited by
    #365

    @Alex-Rendell hi Alex, yes I've been following it since January it took a while to recover actually. But yes it's a set and forget and it's still in the filters...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #366

    @Martin no not at all.. It wasn't criticism at all.. I get it if your busy checking all sorts here and there.. it can be time consuming thats for sure....... maybe it just stuck a chord with me as it's called Martin's over 1.5, but I get that your busy... it did have a few dodgey months so your right, although it did pick up.. but nevertheless we'll leave it there. Wasn't my Intention to criticise, anyway I've been working on a couple of set amd forgets of my own that are baring fruit. Once I've had more results I'll send you the filters or results. Or better both.... been a bit quiet the past few weeks.. although the good old winter leagues are back and should be ripe for the picking soon.... ⚽️💚

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • joshua armstrongJ Offline
    joshua armstrongJ Offline
    joshua armstrong
    wrote on last edited by
    #367
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Arran Shackell on last edited by
    #368

    @Arran-Shackell Looks super dodgy. I bet the bookies are scrambling to figure out who took the over 10+ goals bet. 😅

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to nick on last edited by
    #369

    @nick Absolutely! I genuinely can't believe the difference in liquidity on Betfair when comparing these leagues to the more popular ones. It's great to trade football though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Arran Shackell
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #370

    @Correa

    I came onto this thread to specifically talk about this game. Just one mad anomaly in my opinion.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nickN Offline
    nickN Offline
    nick
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #371

    @Correa I was watching that as it was also reccommended for the split stake strategy but 2 goals in the first 20 minutes meant no bet:😠 Was tempted to do it anyway as it looked like more goals coming but wanting to follow Martin and Ryans advice at the moment and be strict with my trades. SHG would of been nice too especially is you kept backing them. The emails have been doing ok for me this last week apart from that one bet so far today. I also find it difficult to get on them in one hit in the lesser known leagues due to liquidity especially earlier in the week.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #372

    I've started paper trading football strategies this week, using just the daily email for now. Some of the outcomes in these lesser-known leagues have been quite surprising. For instance, today "Martin's Over 3.5 Goal Lays" recommended the Malaysia Super League match:

    Kelantan vs. Selangor

    The result? Kelantan 2 - 11 Selangor. Shocking 13 goals in a single match! Some matches do just seem off.

    nickN A 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • RyanR Offline
    RyanR Offline
    Ryan
    replied to joshua armstrong on last edited by
    #373

    @joshua-armstrong Then I will let @Martin answer this as I know this is a strategy he knows more about 😄

    Founder of BTC - Pro Trader - Main Sports Tennis and Football

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • joshua armstrongJ Offline
    joshua armstrongJ Offline
    joshua armstrong
    replied to Ryan on last edited by
    #374

    @Ryan sorry I meant when team played away how far would u consider far? 200miles etc? Thanks

    RyanR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RyanR Offline
    RyanR Offline
    Ryan
    replied to joshua armstrong on last edited by
    #375

    @joshua-armstrong I like 10 games personally that was always great for me! 😄

    Founder of BTC - Pro Trader - Main Sports Tennis and Football

    joshua armstrongJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Martin
    #376

    @John-Malloy sounds like you are criticising me but doesn't matter you are welcome to do so 🙂 and if not then that's also fine, may just be the way I'm reading that comment.

    I simply don't have time to manually check the results of all of the football strategies, so I use the ones that have worked well for me or I see have great potential. Purely a time constraint, when we have the update in the future we can test all of this automatically. So it would be inpractical for me to spend 20 hours+ a week trying to track the results of every single football strategy.

    Hope that explains it clearly to you.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alex Rendell
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #377

    @John-Malloy Are you still following this strategy? Is it the "Martin Over 1.5 Set and Forget" one in the members filters? Going to start tracking the data myself for a few months if so.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #378

    @Karl-Pick I don't think at any point I actually criticised anyone. And Im not expecting winners every single day. You jumped to two cinclusions there . The actual point I was making is that I was surprised it was being canned as Martin freely admitted he was barely checking the results. I was simply saying I find that quite surprising as he "thinks" its underperformed. Rather than recording the results.

    A MartinM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • joshua armstrongJ Offline
    joshua armstrongJ Offline
    joshua armstrong
    wrote on last edited by
    #379

    when checking how far away last game was if teams played away what would be considered too far? i havent been doing this in my game research but going to add it @Ryan @Martin

    RyanR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andy Donnelly
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #380

    @Martin Yeh seems to be the opposite tho, if I’m reading it right it’s stating you don’t want home odds lower than 1.7.

    Logically it doesn’t make sense to me, as an example there is one game on tonight Start v Asane in the Norwegian 2nd division. It’ qualifies on all points other than Start being 1.65 (at time of writing).

    Having said the above I won’t be making changes to a strategy that is doing well at the moment, but another one to look at when back testing becomes available to see what impact it has had.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.