Set & Forget Football Strategies

[Richard Latimer]

Overnight I will be laying:

The home team

[Martin]

@joshua-armstrong the idea of not being in top 3 isn't one of mine so I can't answer. Was it one of Ryan's?

[joshua armstrong]

Hi guys just a quick question I know for research when going for goals we make sure both teams aren't in top 3 but would this still count if they were both in top 3 on different conference leagues like usa mls? Or overall points top 3 both conferences leagues? @Ryan @Martin many thanks

[Richard Latimer]

Cerro lost 0-1
Fenix lost 1-2

2/2 today

[Richard Latimer]

Went to bed at 1-0. Woke up and they'd turned it around to defeat NE 1-3.

I'm going to post my selections on this thread for a bit before moving to my own in Aug. Hopefully rest of month goes well.

Laying CA Cerro & Fenix in todays Uruguayan games.

[Martin]

@Richard-Latimer said in Set & Forget Football Strategies:

I said when I got 300 trades in I'd divulge what I've been doing and now is the time. Going through a little bit of a sticky patch but July still just about up.

So this is a home lay system:

Raw data is 435 strong, 75% s/r, average odds 4.1 and profit almost 79pts. Overall yield from that is 5.76%

My filter is this:

Although if home team has a higher points total than away I remove those games and don't keep the records anymore.

But the raw data isn't where I stop. Yes I have made sure things are way less complicated than previous and I have avoided jumping down the rabbit hole. That said there are a few tweaks I make to the raw data as follows:

These tweaks do the following:

Trades 300
Wins 255
s/r 85%
Total profit 156pts (to 1pt level staking)
Ave odds 4.4
Yield 15.3%

That's it for now but just to finish off by saying I have a lay in of New England at present.

156pts profit wow! Good work

[Richard Latimer]

Also on the tweaks to filter I will clarify that while I combine some stats with one other I will never combine more than 2 after the last system and all the pitfalls I uncovered.

[Richard Latimer]

I said when I got 300 trades in I'd divulge what I've been doing and now is the time. Going through a little bit of a sticky patch but July still just about up.

So this is a home lay system:

Raw data is 435 strong, 75% s/r, average odds 4.1 and profit almost 79pts. Overall yield from that is 5.76%

My filter is this:

Although if home team has a higher points total than away I remove those games and don't keep the records anymore.

But the raw data isn't where I stop. Yes I have made sure things are way less complicated than previous and I have avoided jumping down the rabbit hole. That said there are a few tweaks I make to the raw data as follows:

These tweaks do the following:

Trades 300
Wins 255
s/r 85%
Total profit 156pts (to 1pt level staking)
Ave odds 4.4
Yield 15.3%

That's it for now but just to finish off by saying I have a lay in of New England at present.

[Martin]

@Terry-Cooke yes they work better as Back Unders since Covid got back to normal, not many selections per year which is a problem for it

[Terry Cooke]

@Martin Are you not tracking the results for Tomasz Under 1.5 Goals Lays anymore?

[ross love]

@Martin Nice one, thanks mate.

[Martin]

@ross-love no but these are the results since Dec 26th 2023 when I created it:

[ross love]

@Martin Is there at results tracker for that anywhere Martin?

[Martin]

Added Back Home Team at short odds to OP

[ross love]

@Martin Nice one, thanks Martin.

[Martin]

@ross-love yep 3.7-5.5 odds

[ross love]

@Martin Thanks mate, so that is the filter for the results that have been doing well on the results sheet? Also, are there any rules you have on entries mate, i.e odds?

[Martin]

@ross-love I use 2.0 but it has had a bad run of late, avoid 1.0 like the plague it's not at all optimised

[ross love]

Looking at the tracker, the lay away strategy has performed well over a long period of time. Are people trading this? If not, which of the 2.0 and 3.0 versions are people trading?

[Martin]

Added lay and back home strategies from my video this week in the opening post.