Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Football Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
42.9k Posts 268 Posters 3.4m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Martin Walker
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #30281

    @james-woodroffe i was waiting till 15 mins but i have just switched to trialling 1.65 to see if its a good mix of value and catching some earlier ones

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to Martin Walker on last edited by
    #30282

    @martin-walker @Alan-Steward thats the thing they either come in the first 6 minutes or the last 6 minutes it seems. 😂 sometimes if they’re on both FHG and 2HG when they come late I can ignore them for a 2HG cause I’ve already made nice green. If it gets to HT 0-0 they tend to score within 5 minutes of the restart 🙄

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30283

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    Very much depends on the success of your filter... Odds depended on conversion rates... Don't get confused between the 2 👍

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin Walker on last edited by
    #30284

    @martin-walker said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @james-woodroffe i never do well with the standard 1.51 on fhg. Only started doing really well when i took advantage of the great odds you can get in the first half compared to second half

    backing with odds like 1.51 in long term is not so good i think and fhg is very difficult to win money in long run

    ? James WoodroffeJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Martin Walker
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #30285

    @james-woodroffe i never do well with the standard 1.51 on fhg. Only started doing really well when i took advantage of the great odds you can get in the first half compared to second half

    ? James WoodroffeJ 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by A Former User
    #30286

    @james-woodroffe Check your goal times... I've started backing @ 25% @ KO, 15mins, 25mins & 35mins

    Average around 0.34pts per win but win or lose every time... It's more profitable on my filters to do it this way although always measuring as we're moving into summer leagues.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30287

    @john-hurst said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    have laid GAIS

    i hope that gais go to 0-2 rthen relay them

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30288

    @alan-steward so I need to have a look at my FHG filter. My strike rate seems thru the roof. However I’m only entering once odds hit 2.0 and not the standard 1.51-1.53 so as a result I’m missing heaps. Maybe that’s a good thing but maybe I should just look at putting an order in as a set and forget? 🤔

    ? M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #30289

    have laid GAIS

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Finn Kristensen on last edited by
    #30290

    @finn-kristensen Am very surprised at that result mate... Follow a lot of Swiss football for FHG's

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #30291

    Going to do a correct score in Norway

    Viking v Kristiansund
    Dutching 3-1, 2-2 & 1-3 for 0.25pts

    Will also be looking for a FHG... Hopefully back 0.5FHG @ 1.53 for 0.5pts (will keep eye on in-play stats)

    If FHG gets matched & wins I get free bet on CS, if FHG loses will asses @ HT & look to lay 0-0, 1-0 & 0-1 for 0.75pts... Should be good for standalone FHG or back o1.5 @ HT if still 0-0

    James WoodroffeJ ? 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Finn KristensenF Offline
    Finn KristensenF Offline
    Finn Kristensen
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30292

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 0-3 now mate... Dead & burried

    0-6 now, The Grasshoppers players should seriously be ashamed of themselves. No pride apparently.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30293

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Football Trading Thread:

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 Yes mate odds are shocking... Market always expects goals and the league always delivers goals... I took 0.3pts from FHG but traded cautiously as expected fairly quiet FH's... But just about every match in the League had FHG lol

    yes and gais 0-1

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30294

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 Yes mate odds are shocking... Market always expects goals and the league always delivers goals... I took 0.3pts from FHG but traded cautiously as expected fairly quiet FH's... But just about every match in the League had FHG lol

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #30295

    ceazy switserland is not possible to get in sh only from ko lay u 4.5

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #30296

    @johannes-van-leeuwen-0 0-3 now mate... Dead & burried

    Finn KristensenF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #30297

    grasshoppers again 0-2

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    wrote on last edited by
    #30298

    Two small losses in those matches( £4 ) over the two games i can accept. I am going to ltd in the Qatar game as this is on my late goal filter and inplay stats look ok, 75 gone

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin Walker on last edited by
    #30299

    @martin-walker Sounds about right mate... I would look to do the same thing

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #30300

    Ignore this now as Grasshoppers have just fallen 0-3 behind... Vaduz do not need to take any chances even though I fully expect them to win

    Okay, tracking the two main games in the Swiss Challenge League and my eyes lit up at HT

    Vaduz currently 1-1
    Grasshoppers currently losing 0-1

    Both above teams competing for the Promotion play off spot (2nd)

    As would expect odds are poor and am more interested in LTD with Vaduz... If it hits around 2.5

    Then if Grasshoppers equalise look to do the same thing with them

    If LCS gets to around 3.0 then I might skip LTD... Not expecting decent odds here though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.