Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Horse Racing Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Horse Racing
important
6.4k Posts 173 Posters 681.0k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5521

    @dan-erridge said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @alan-steward

    Bet Angel mate

    Have you seen the file within the shared file thread where they knocked up a rules file to LTF when 2 horses went below 2.0 odds... I've been running it but unfortunately 1 sometimes kicks out when the 2nd goes under leaving only 1 matched... Have wondered if you could create a file where it kicks in with 2 in running & under 2.0 lol

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5522

    @alan-steward Well surprised mine didn't match at 1.37 seemed a very tight finish. Think looking at the Betfair charts another got to 1.45

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5523

    Looks like that might be it until 22:15 @ Will Rogers

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5524

    @alan-steward

    Bet Angel mate

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5525

    @dan-erridge Dan, what software you running?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5526

    2 there for me

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5527

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    added to simulation

    2 matched if anybody was interested

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to james everard on last edited by
    #5528

    @james-everard

    Hi mate, yeah been doing bits and bobs, not getting to involved as waiting for footy etc, do ltf when i get chance, seems to be going ok for me on the whole, yes the price is the tricky point i think, 1.81 seem to get a lot of 2's matched which is small profit, so i guess its ok there

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5529

    Unfortunately it might do but I'm not that advanced but I am in the process of setting up my own bot and will certainly be looking into achieving that

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5530

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    Takes a lot of screen watching to record this data... Sometimes I have to talk to the better half 😂 😂 😂

    Haha yeah.....I wasn't sure if it recorded it all post race.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5531

    @alan-steward

    Ok not to worry. It was worth asking. I was thinking 21:45 looked good but only 8 runners.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5532

    Takes a lot of screen watching to record this data... Sometimes I have to talk to the better half 😂 😂 😂

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5533

    @richard-latimer Sorry mate, don't have time for that

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5534

    @dan-erridge Yes been using the same criteria as the others just trying different prices. How's your b2l going mate ?

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5535

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    added to simulation

    @Alan-Steward

    Could you do me a favour please and add those with sub 4.0 faves as long as 4 runners under 10.0 but without laying the fave? I guess as it's simulation it won't really matter if laying the fave or not but just thinking I would like to track these and it would be easier for you doing this as I don't have a bot.

    Cheers

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #5536

    added to simulation

    Richard LatimerR ? 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5537

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @richard-latimer Yes mate that's true... Does @Martin-Futter say upto 1m1F? Might be worth a pop @ 2.04

    No, think he goes 1250-1650. 1m1f is around 1800m.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5538

    @richard-latimer said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    So the 20:15 is no good but remove the fave and it looks you have a very tightly contested field. I'm not going to put money on it but certainly watching for purposes of recording the information.

    And that would have worked in the sense that nothing got matched other than the fave. So no win, no loss.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #5539

    @richard-latimer Yes mate that's true... Does @Martin-Futter say upto 1m1F? Might be worth a pop @ 2.04

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #5540

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    20:30 @ tampa looks game on... Might change before kick off though

    1m1f. All your recorded races thus far have been 1600m max.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.