The BTC Horse Racing Thread
-
Think so. Its just something i noticed when i was messing with it and thought that it was pretty interesting.
-
@Joseph-Henderson said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@Jonathan-Jones said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@Dan-MacKinnon
What i noticed with BFBM is you can share a bank between strategies so there is scope for a combined approach depending on your strategies. Perhaps combine a couple of stable strats to share a bank and grow faster but keep some of the more bouncy ones on their own.Does show though that there is a lot more to think about then just winning bets. Bank management is a powerful tool.
Is that the tick box next to the “set new” button? Then you can select which strategy banks to combine?
Yes. It’s a useful feature that. I’ve got strategies on different sized banks at varying degrees of percentage of banks (2%, 1% and 0.5). I’ve done a dependent strategy in the past when I was tracking steamers. It worked ok.
-
@Jonathan-Jones said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@Dan-MacKinnon
What i noticed with BFBM is you can share a bank between strategies so there is scope for a combined approach depending on your strategies. Perhaps combine a couple of stable strats to share a bank and grow faster but keep some of the more bouncy ones on their own.Does show though that there is a lot more to think about then just winning bets. Bank management is a powerful tool.
Is that the tick box next to the “set new” button? Then you can select which strategy banks to combine?
-
-
@Dan-MacKinnon
What i noticed with BFBM is you can share a bank between strategies so there is scope for a combined approach depending on your strategies. Perhaps combine a couple of stable strats to share a bank and grow faster but keep some of the more bouncy ones on their own.Does show though that there is a lot more to think about then just winning bets. Bank management is a powerful tool.
-
@Caroline-Middlebrook said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Hey guys, I am trying to use BFBM to automate a strategy that is based on BSP. It's fine for a strategy where I don't have any limits on the price, but I have a lay strategy where I want to implement a maximum odds.
The betfair interface allows you to do this by clicking 'Set SP odds limit' which then gives you a field to input the minimum odds for back bets or maximum odds for lay bets, but I cannot get this to work in BFFM!
I have gone through this thread in their forum but it is still not working:
https://www.bfbotmanager.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?t=3243
Any ideas?
CAROLINE-Ask this question on the Horse Racing Strategies Megathread, they should be able to help!
-
I messed about with excel and got it to compare a combined approach. It's definitely more risky but could be a decent bank builder. It appears to be simply compounding, but when it's combined it compounds at a greater rate due to the volume of trades.
I think there's good and bad to both. What you're potentially losing by not combining you should make up with longevity.
-
@Martin Currently doing Back The Fav, LTBF and Lay Third Fav on horses. Then Tom Lay U1.5 and a late goal strategy. Feels like first two weeks in July were on fire, then second half has been pretty muted. LTBF and Tom Lay U1.5 are each down around 10%.
-
@Joseph-Henderson great work, which strategies?
-
@Jonathan-Jones
Yeah, I guess the risk you take on with a shared bank may be worth it for the early stages to grow your bank faster, particularly if starting off small. Could always split the bank up once you get to a stage where having a big drawdown (say 50%+) seems too scary..
-
Interesting isnt it? No doubt a shared bank is a much bigger risk due to a wayward strategy (particularly if you are introducing an untested strategy) but i think it comes down to the bank size. If you are building a small bank then you get much more benefit for a smaller investment from a shared bank. If you have a good bank already and you are after an income or retirement type bank building then a split bank might be what you want.
-
@Jonathan-Jones
I just did some analysis of my trades this month. Running 5 strategies with split equal banks I am around 14% up (not been an amazing month to be honest, two strategies are down). If you export every bet and assume 1% stake of a rolling total bank the return is 65% with a max drawdown of 30.25%. Quite interesting..
-
I wrote a small app to help me reconcile my results every day. I download the individual results and import them. By default it runs the shared bank but strategies are selectable so i can just turn ones off to get what a single one does (that would match the backtesters output directly). So for this the shared one is obviously already done. I just ran the others individually then added the daily returns in excel and worked out the DD.
The massive difference was what made me look at it in detail because it really surprised me. But as a simple summary i guess you coud say you either:
Get approx 5 times the profit for a third of the investment but put up with a considerable DD on the shared bank.
or
Get approx a fifth of the profit for about a third of the DD with the split bank.So do you make the bigger investment and play it safe (and accept lower returns) or invest a smaller sum and take the ride? If i had a big bank then its a no brainer but for a very small bank to grow then its a bit less clear cut.
-
@Dan-MacKinnon said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@Jonathan-Jones really interesting. Just out of curiosity, how did you manage to track all 3 together?
Wow, that is some food for thought. That’s the question I was going to ask!
-
@Jonathan-Jones really interesting. Just out of curiosity, how did you manage to track all 3 together?
-
Got some numbers.
Its based on the 3 strategies i run (2 lay, 1 back). If i started with £99 total bank (just to make it easy) at the start of jan.With all 3 strats sharing that total bank and a stake size of 1% i would today have a balance of £7161. The biggest DD though would of been 49.59% of that total bank which would of at the time it happend been a monetary drop of £316 (but that max DD lasted for only 5 days, 6th day cleared it).
If i took that £99 and split it evenly so each strat is managing its own bank of £33 with the same 1% stake size then today i would have a balance of £421.74. The biggest DD was 16.64% which represented a monetary drop of £35.
Just as an extra if i was just wanting to play with penuts and started a shared bank with £33 (so i really dont give a crap if i lose it, just a round of beers really) then by same rules i would have £2386. Obviously same %DD of 49.59% and a monetary drop of £105.
So not sure what that says really. Obviously splitting the bank is miles safer but at what point does being safe trump making some progress? If you have a fair bit of money then fair enough but if starting small then sharing the tiny bank you dont care about losing thats the same size as one of the splits is 5 times the profits for a third of the investment.
-
@Jonathan-Jones
If you pull together any numbers to compare the two approaches I'd definitely be keen to take a look!
-
Was thinking that way so its seems safer but the difference in account growth between the methods is just massive. might run some numbers to get a proper comparison.
-
Hey guys, I am trying to use BFBM to automate a strategy that is based on BSP. It's fine for a strategy where I don't have any limits on the price, but I have a lay strategy where I want to implement a maximum odds.
The betfair interface allows you to do this by clicking 'Set SP odds limit' which then gives you a field to input the minimum odds for back bets or maximum odds for lay bets, but I cannot get this to work in BFFM!
I have gone through this thread in their forum but it is still not working:
https://www.bfbotmanager.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?t=3243
Any ideas?
