The BTC Horse Racing Thread
-
Fancy these as potential decent back to lays today, no strategy yet, just going to monitor for a while. Not got an odds range as monitoring but guessing below 3.0 BSP won't be very easy to DOB and anything odds on is totally void.
Mah Mate Bob 1.07 Ayr
Flaminger 1.55 Ascot
Marie's Diamond 2.40 Newmarket
Rockesbury 5.00 Wolves -
Iām also looking forward to this software coming into effect. Like the idea of different trade selections being provided as it would seem to give you the opportunity to pick trades based on your own personal trading style/ attitude to risk
-
@gary-brown I think it's similar but easier for people to use, think it also suggests selections based on what type of trade you want to do, will know more when we all see it!
yes the big advantage of horses is that you can trade it during the normal working day, so for me it's ideal as I can still spend social hours with family
-
can we do selections like with the footie.
It would be great trade a few horses and move onto the footie in the evenings.
Also helps when their are gaps in the footie seasons with limited games if we can get the gee gees winning us all some cash -
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@gary-brown I'm definitely going to be getting much more involved on horses, I'm so excited about the new software.
fantastic.
-
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Good start to these:
Kitty Galore Down Royal 1.15 - BSP 190 Low of 90 IR
Taboo Uttoxeter 16.20 - BSP 152 Low of 60 IR
Chagall Dundalk 19.00 - BSP 5.05 Low of 1.76 IRIs this a regular feature now Martin?
love to learn how to back to lay etc. -
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Fancy these as potential decent back to lays today, no strategy yet, just going to monitor for a while.
Kitty Galore Down Royal 1.15
Taboo Uttoxeter 16.20
Chagall Dundalk 19.00Kitty Galore BSP 190 came into 90
Taboo 152 BSP came into 60
Assume Chagall went low given that it lost by a short head, good first day will update when timeform update the BSP and inplay low.
Yep 5.05 to 1.76, cracking selections esp the last!
-
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Fancy these as potential decent back to lays today, no strategy yet, just going to monitor for a while.
Kitty Galore Down Royal 1.15
Taboo Uttoxeter 16.20
Chagall Dundalk 19.00Kitty Galore BSP 190 came into 90
Taboo 152 BSP came into 60
Assume Chagall went low given that it lost by a short head, good first day will update when timeform update the BSP and inplay low.
-
@martin-futter how you selecting them mate? With the run up to the software coming id like to automate a few horse racing things or at least test a few with min stakes. I tried back to lays but i think my criteria was too relaxed a while a go. Iv only really made money pre race scalping. Probably hold off till software see what people come up with.
-
Putting up slowmo in next at Newcastle as a back to lay....around 7.4 to back .
-
@martin-futter are you getting money matched on these bud? low liquidity on these horses might be the issue long term?
-
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Fancy these as potential decent back to lays today, no strategy yet, just going to monitor for a while.
Kitty Galore Down Royal 1.15
Taboo Uttoxeter 16.20
Chagall Dundalk 19.00Kitty Galore BSP 190 came into 90
Taboo 152 BSP came into 60
-
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Fancy these as potential decent back to lays today, no strategy yet, just going to monitor for a while.
Kitty Galore Down Royal 1.15
Taboo Uttoxeter 16.20
Chagall Dundalk 19.00Kitty Galore BSP 190 came into 90
-
@tony-smith totally agree re John Folan selections
-
-
@john-folan hi John, have you deleted your last few threads because they were unsuccessful? If so, that's a pity because I suspect that a system based on the parameters you set could be feasible in the long term
