Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 131 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #8701

    Great session of cricket what a fascinating series.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8702

    LAY BANG small and looking for small ticks on basis NZ wont follow up such a poor score
    1.6 be great

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #8703

    Momentum shift at the moment and have backed England now at 1.78 would be great if these two were still there at lunch. 1.30 would be tops.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8704

    @nathan-bennett the flog has had his 15 minutes now he can kindly F off. Raises the question tho how easy it would be to seriously injure a player if you were that way inclined.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8705

    jarvo how

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8706

    nice

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #8707

    Lovely start England keep it up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8708

    Boom! Over 2s 💥

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8709

    Wasn’t expecting a wicket this early but puts England lay in a good position, see if Malans dismissal can see us close to 2 💪🏼

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8710

    @tom involved hard . A possible re lay at 1.3’s

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8711

    @nathan-bennett like Tom I got them at 1.42 and will be holding. Whilst I don’t exactly like the saying but Root was “due” to miss out which obviously means someone else will have to step up. 3’s would be lovely 🤔😜but Thakur certainly dragged India back yesterday and with no Root feel it’s game on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8712

    @nathan-bennett this is my angle, I’ve got on a 1.4 and will look to get out at around 3, but this may change 🤣

    Whatever England put on the board if India come out like they did at Headingley for second innings the England price will drift and the draw will come back in for round 2 💪🏼

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8713

    @nathan-bennett without root malan needs to get a really good score and be well supported by Pope and bairstow for another 250 to be achievable think.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #8714

    Is ENG the right price or short
    Like if they score another 250 from here what’s that put them 1.3’s perhaps wee bit lower

    Thinking a LAY
    1.55 - 3 would be great
    Don’t ask for much

    ? ? James WoodroffeJ 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8715

    @tom nice work. I laid England also early in their innings before the 2 wickets and getting Root before stumps is massive. Someone will have to step up tomorrow and England will still bat last. Will be another absorbing test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8716

    Roots gone, massive wicket for India especially at this time of day. England still strong favourites in the markets eyes, going to be a great few days for trading.

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8717

    @tom let’s hope it’s well founded!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8718

    Only a 15 tick price movement after those wickets, the market has a lot of confidence in Root. Laid England at 1.4

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8719

    @clare-taylor said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles not now those wickets have fallen IMO

    Haha, no quite!! I spoke too soon!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8720

    @matt-ayles not now those wickets have fallen IMO

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.