Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.2k Posts 131 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #8521

    Greened up now at 1.23 @Nathan-Bennett yeah some poor shot selection panic batting.

    Nathan BennettN James WoodroffeJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8522

    @tom concur 1.5 be nice remove some

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8523

    Laying Kent around 1.24

    Nathan BennettN ? 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #8524

    @james-woodroffe chasing hard with charging slogs like that from salt . Cool heads prevail

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #8525

    @james-woodroffe said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Backed Kent at 2.08 after 15 overs. Looking for them to get 175.

    I’ll take 169 as a target it’s about par for Edgbaston in the Blast but will wait and see reckon it will take some chasing.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #8526

    Backed Kent at 2.08 after 15 overs. Looking for them to get 175.

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8527

    backed KENT o159.5

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8528

    @tom amazing
    takes just one over
    they were close to where HAM were similar stage
    those low full toss missed yorkers under pressure happen alot

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8529

    @nathan-bennett seemed almost impossible with 5 overs left and needing a big run rate, crowd were going mad last over, a proper buzz

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8530

    bowling team sub 1.1 favs defending can almost always get ya stake back @1.2 and see what happens
    some belief in batters to hit boundary's of course

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8531

    What a game, I laid Hampshire after the first Somerset wicket and spent the next 18 overs expecting to say goodbye to my stake. Just goes to show you anything can happen in T20 👍🏼

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    wrote on last edited by
    #8532

    Wow what a match! Sadly I couldn’t trade it as I couldn’t be at home for it but an amazing start to the finals day none the less. Hope quite a few made some nice green.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8533

    [email protected] lay been nice

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8534

    Small back SOM 6.6
    Winning profit in a t20 game for once

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #8535

    SOM could trade evens some point

    BOOM funny

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8536

    @nathan-bennett if weatherley stays in they should get that

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    DJ Reid
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8537

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    blast on foxtel bonus
    any angles peeps fire away

    infact with an enormous schedule of t20's incoming be pretty cool to discuss some fav strategies game plans we all have entering these roller coaster events

    will post some of my mine tmr that keep eye on

    This will be great 👍

    I'm getting the hang of things in Test Matches. Still trying to find something/experimenting with T20 thats not scalping between balls/boundaries/wickets

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #8538

    Backed HAM o135.5 runs

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #8539

    @nathan-bennett they were lucky with that no ball! Have prevented immediate collapse at least!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8540

    @clare-taylor my eyes on that last 2mins . could still well back Hamp to close INNS later

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.