Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #6841

    AFG normally bring Rashid on around overs 10-14. i am going to have a cheeky lay on NED when that comes, as price is now good

    Nathan BennettN Stuart WallaceS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #6842

    intent is huge
    been taking some out 60% red out
    more at 1.12 and 1.18 be sensational will have 80% out and see what happens for a while after that

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6843

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @simji yes, ive ended up trying to scalp 1.05 - 1.08

    which it did !

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Simji
    wrote on last edited by
    #6844

    Liability and small profit is green. Awaiting for others to match. @1.12 if it ever gets there

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Simji
    wrote on last edited by
    #6845

    0_1643107157954_Screenshot_20220125-103823.jpg

    Planned exits me thinks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #6846

    captaincy killing us plenty bowlers left going better than this flog
    weird

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #6847

    walked away thought 5 down ha sick
    ok now ha

    another
    1.07 starting chase be great lets go

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #6848

    so far all these games been similar
    game two NETH got 1.15 fairly quick and still 1.13 after 35 overs ish chasing a rate of 6.5
    so could take a while to get paid if do ha

    NETH have done well with slow bowling nek minnit pace 4-6 odd ha

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Simji on last edited by
    #6849

    @simji yes, ive ended up trying to scalp 1.05 - 1.08

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Simji
    wrote on last edited by
    #6850

    Got in just before the 4th wicket. Half stake at both 1.05 and 1.06. ... Realistically can't expect anything more that 1.08 back?

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #6851

    one more lay if happens early wicket when NETH bat be happy for a lay to back like 1.03-1.06

    some stroke play swinging bat now

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Simji
    wrote on last edited by
    #6852

    Still waiting to see how the inngs goes probably get in on the neth bat

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6853

    @stuart-wallace should be no threat to our entry point

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #6854

    they say double score after 30, so should be in region of 230

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6855

    @stuart-wallace let it roll sickening if another pole and close to target trades .., realistically if we make money it will be with NETH's bats
    if if mass poles and market hit my spots before NETH bat would adjust trades maybe just red out and see what NETH do with bat first 6-8 overs etc

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6856

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @nathan-bennett went to 1.08 but quickly back to 1.06. Surprising how quickly the price gets filled in

    given that situation, is it not good to exit immediately on wicket and then come back in again once its settled down ? or just let it roll.
    i put my biggest ever lay on, surprising how little liability it was.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #6857

    @nathan-bennett went to 1.08 but quickly back to 1.06. Surprising how quickly the price gets filled in

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6858

    @stuart-wallace wicket hopefully we stay infront of market for a few overs at least

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #6859

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace love it

    ideally these one sided market affairs do like to get in later in INNS couldnt resist ha

    haha.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6860

    @stuart-wallace love it

    ideally these one sided market affairs do like to get in later in INNS couldnt resist ha

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.