BTC Cricket Trading Thread
-
Well, today has been a day to remember with cricket trading...
Both winners, AFG and UAE were at times 1.05...both times i layed them with big money at that price.
Although both sides won in the end, both times i bottled out with exiting far too early.
UAE were at one stage 62-2 chasing 120, and the 1.05 had slid to 1.01 , ok, i thought i've lost my money , but then UGA fought back to get them 87-7 . But when they took the 4th wicket i was just happy to recoup my red and exited.
Lots of respect for UGA ... they put up one hell of a fight.
Trading wise, even though i said i was going to just let the lay run in the second game, i again, bottled out and let huge opportunities through my greasy mitts.Doh....next time ! (he says!)
-
I'm listening to Nathans advice now, UAE were 1.05 v Uganada with UGA 3 down early, so i jumped in with a 200 lay - gonna let this one run a bit longer ! - currently at 1.11
-
@matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:
Unfortunately going to be a scratch for me. Laid Afg low and removed liability for a "free bet" on Holland. Was going to green it up but it never got there.
a scratch is better than a loss and you could have cleaned up with no risk had Netherlands continued the promising start
-
Unfortunately going to be a scratch for me. Laid Afg low and removed liability for a "free bet" on Holland. Was going to green it up but it never got there.
-
@stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:
Intriguing game to trade.
Lots of money to be made if you traded intelligently, clearly i'm a dumbo - i came out with a much smaller green than i should have. Especially as i had Layed AFG with 500 at 1.05, and they were 1.34 at one stage. - but i bottled out at 1.08 !!! - what an idiot !
However, quite a learning curve in this one, and thankjs to Nathan for his advice and strategy.Something like this where it is right at the bottom of the market when you enter I always put in twice as much as i want and back out half a couple of ticks higher, it very rarely will stay as low as it started
-
Intriguing game to trade.
Lots of money to be made if you traded intelligently, clearly i'm a dumbo - i came out with a much smaller green than i should have. Especially as i had Layed AFG with 500 at 1.05, and they were 1.34 at one stage. - but i bottled out at 1.08 !!! - what an idiot !
However, quite a learning curve in this one, and thankjs to Nathan for his advice and strategy. -
Tidy trade this morning, 1.04 out to 1.16, could have held out for more but ROI is great at the bottom of the ladder
-
@stuart-wallace havn’t entered again if had of prior plan would of been 1.1-1.3 target styles
Hope all went well amazing partnership at beginning
-
@nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:
That sub 1.1 was tempting
As already going well left it haFire up NETH deserve to make it a sweat
Hmmm, sub 1.1 now ! and Ackermann is still in !
I took it on at 1.8. -
@simji said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:
wow just got back in, didnt expect this!
wish i didnt get out so early
me too.
Nathan made a killing, i bottled out. AFG were over 1.3 at one stage -
That sub 1.1 was tempting
As already going well left it haFire up NETH deserve to make it a sweat
-
@stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:
AFG normally bring Rashid on around overs 10-14. i am going to have a cheeky lay on NED when that comes, as price is now good
Ok, one over out, but he's now on, so picked up a cheeky lay at 8.6
-
@nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:
wow fill up this locked away a lot of the good stuff GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN
well done mate
-
wow fill up this locked away a lot of the good stuff GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN
that includes a peanut on the tie @100 #nosickbeats
-
@stuart-wallace oath that's why love a couple more ticks asap
1.12 bang
-
AFG normally bring Rashid on around overs 10-14. i am going to have a cheeky lay on NED when that comes, as price is now good
-
intent is huge
been taking some out 60% red out
more at 1.12 and 1.18 be sensational will have 80% out and see what happens for a while after that