Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.2k Posts 131 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4321

    I’ll break my remote if score 192 and miss by one on line bet

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4322

    Taken 1/3rd my stake out of my AUS 3.5 back

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4323

    @stuart-wallace It is so hard flicking between the tabs. I really want to get a decent PC (rather than laptop), dual screens, and ideally a tv on the wall above with the live sport on... but that's currently unrealistic given my (lack of) budget.

    Nice work so far though, +3 points?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #4324

    I exited PAK back with 1.3 points gain.
    One thing i have noticed quickly is that trading more than 1 game is impossible for me without multiple screens

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4325

    Seeing as we're supposed to bounce off each other during this afternoon, here's what has been in my head the last 5 minutes.

    Australia are going along nicely, I'll give it another over if its Chahal next and then back Australia... I'll then definitely back Australia when Wade comes in... Although no that's the old me talking, too much gambling on opinion. Stick with the strategy no matter what. Wait for low odds... be patient.

    Old me would have been in a real spot of bother there with Wade gone... current me still not placed a trade.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4326

    Aussies wickets all p**s soft really
    Smith was out done rest given away

    Backed AUS 3.55 till end INNS

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4327

    Are Australia just seeing off Chahal?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #4328

    Seen the write up. Controversial for sure.

    Still no live trades for me yet. Trying to remain disciplined rather than jump in as I used to.

    This game has changed around. Australia need a partnership for the next 5 or 6 overs, then send Wade in for a slog.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4329

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    That’s a farce f**k off

    No pictures for me... assuming getting Maxy run out was unwise? lol

    rubbish decision - how can the bail not be out the stump when he's knocked it sidewards !

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4330

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    That’s a farce f**k off

    No pictures for me... assuming getting Maxy run out was unwise? lol

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4331

    That’s a farce f**k off

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4332

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    England also choose to BOWL

    Hales in for Malan, Jacks moves to 3. Willey in for Curran.

    Gonna execute my back PAK whilst the openers are there backed at 2.18 - gonna look for my exit point

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #4333

    England also choose to BOWL

    Hales in for Malan, Jacks moves to 3. Willey in for Curran.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4334

    @matt-ayles chahal factor

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4335

    50 in 19 balls is like watching me on the Playstation! I am really surprised that Aus are still hovering around 1.8 given this start. Does the market expect the rate to drop significantly after the powerplay?

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4336

    @stuart-wallace 6 over line was a gimmie bet was processing then 6 hit grrrr

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4337

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Backed AUS over 193 runs

    good call

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4338

    Backed AUS over 193 runs

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #4339

    Green clearly has to be home for dinner, he's not hanging around. Although that kind of batting doesn't come without risks.

    There goes Finch again...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4340

    Eyeing a IND back when Chahal bowls

    Missed backing aus over 57 runs 6 over run line by a second

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.