Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #4201

    Pakistan look long at 2.6

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Dan MacKinnon on last edited by
    #4202

    @dan-mackinnon said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    A potential downfall of making a bot for 1.1 is that every match will have at least 1 losing trade because one team will go down to 1.1 and win. I think that might be another good reason for having the stop loss.

    This is exactly why i thought about the stop loss. There's no guarantee a team won't just get to 1.1 and win.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4203

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Anybody doing PAK v ENG game this afternoon?

    I'm ready to start testing the 1.1 strategy.

    Yes I'm around.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Dan MacKinnon on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #4204

    @dan-mackinnon said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    A potential downfall of making a bot for 1.1 is that every match will have at least 1 losing trade because one team will go down to 1.1 and win. I think that might be another good reason for having the stop loss.

    Yep, i think thats an accepted aspect in that there should be many more other wins than losses. ie situations where it goes 1.1 to 1.2 would far outnumber (hopefully) the 1 losing trade.
    For me, thats an acceptable situation although I suppose there could also be situations where there could be multiple loss trades.
    How its going with the bot Dan?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dan MacKinnon
    wrote on last edited by
    #4205

    A potential downfall of making a bot for 1.1 is that every match will have at least 1 losing trade because one team will go down to 1.1 and win. I think that might be another good reason for having the stop loss.

    “Greed moves the goalposts” - Ryan Holiday

    Stuart WallaceS ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4206

    @stuart-wallace Yeah keeping an eye on it. Fingers crossed!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #4207

    Anybody doing PAK v ENG game this afternoon?

    I'm ready to start testing the 1.1 strategy.

    ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4208

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Bumrah injured for world cup. Blow for India.

    that is a big blow - their leading strike bowler

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4209

    Bumrah injured for world cup. Blow for India.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4210

    CPL
    JAMAICA
    Huge score very likely a winning one
    Opposition only one hope is to be aggressive early
    LAY JT @1.12 and one in the queue @1.06
    Want to take stake back double the odds and monitor

    Actually abandoned 1.06
    If 1.03 early I will lay

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4211

    @brian-doe said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles Worked beautifully that time round 👍🏻

    New Zealand making extremely hard work of this! Their price has gone out to 2.46!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4212

    @matt-ayles Worked beautifully that time round 👍🏻

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4213

    First lay of NZ at 1.09 followed by a wicket and exit at 1.18 - some success! Will continue to watch, see if there are any repeat opportunities

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4214

    @brian-doe said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles WI v NZ looks like it’s got potential

    This is where I need to learn the market movements better as WI have lost 3 wickets for just 2 runs and yet the market has only dropped from 1.2 to 1.17? Was certain the 1.1 would have been hit by now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4215

    @matt-ayles WI v NZ looks like it’s got potential

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4216

    @brian-doe said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Squeaky bum time. Hoping the end of this game isn’t as mental as the last one!

    No opportunities to trade the strategy in this game, but Pakistan went from 1.4 out to 2.0 3 times in the last 2 overs. Crazy swings.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4217
    This post is deleted!
    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4218

    Looks like everyone has forgotten how to bat today then

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4219

    @nathan-bennett presume you hadn't exited your trade then? Another case for removing the stop loss on the strategy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4220

    @matt-ayles bang !!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.