Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 134 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4141

    No idea if Thailand W can bat but PAK 1.05 looks loose

    Small lay of PAK
    See what THAI batters do first few overs PP

    I’ll take stake back @1.1’s if happens and then monitor this one
    1.4’s be a nice little fill up if happens

    That was easy 3 ticks market eased change of INNS
    Free rolling
    This is awesomE BANKED SOME 1.20

    Banked some more 1.4 boom !!! reckon green up at evens if happens

    GREENED UP HOW GOOD peanut tie aswell

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4142

    Wow
    IND SA
    ODI series ?
    Laying batting team after toss pre game 4-5 ticks
    Usual stuff

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4143

    Time zones closely haha
    Nz woman Geezuz 3’s on SP every game
    Free money if involved

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4144

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles Whats the general feel about the 1.1 ?
    do you think its a goer for the World Cup ?

    I definitely think a lay low strategy is workable but perhaps putting a figure on it isn't quite right.

    The womens game earlier didn't hit 1.1 until the Windies were on the verge of victory (although it ended a draw). That one never bounced out. However the NZ side of the market went from 1.25 to around 1.8 or higher 3 times during the second innings as they kept taking wickets in pairs before giving away lots of runs.

    I think a combination of laying at low odds, not creating high liabilities and actually reading the match is how to trade T20s. Plus, as @Nathan-Bennett does, removing liability and banking profit in stages.

    There's another womens game tomorrow but it's a dead rubber now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4145

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @nathan-bennett another excellent 1.1 lay there. I wonder if there's some value in removing liability at 1.2 then seeing if you can get 1.3 or 1.4 all the way up?

    I have wondered this too. Is there any data that we could get from BF that might help us?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4146

    @matt-ayles Whats the general feel about the 1.1 ?
    do you think its a goer for the World Cup ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #4147

    so fed up with work getting in the way of my trading, maybe see if i can get November off too - i can feel there's a big increase in Covid round my way !!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4148

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Bloody tied match!!

    Where's Nathans peanut !?

    There were so many big swings in that match. Windies were 1.03 needing 1 run off 1 ball but ended up losing a wicket instead.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4149

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Bloody tied match!!

    Where's Nathans peanut !?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4150

    Bloody tied match!!

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4151

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    This Windies v NZ tour has been so low scoring. May well be another chance to lay NZ and continue their gift giving series.

    And that they are.

    For transparency for those watching, I didn't want to wait for 1.1 as didn't feel it would get there until very late so i laid NZ at 1.2, i then removed half liability at 1.4, the other half and 1.6 and then locked in and even profit spread at 1.8

    As i type this the Windies have lost 2 wickets in 2 balls so NZ have crashed back into 1.25. Windies need 60 off 64 balls which is very achievable but are now 4 down... McClean might need to stick around for a bit but there's a fair chance this drifts again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4152

    This Windies v NZ tour has been so low scoring. May well be another chance to lay NZ and continue their gift giving series.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4153

    Wow two drop catches in final over haha WI up to muppets

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4154

    this is awesome thanks finch for throwing wicket away greened u p a stack

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4155

    @matt-ayles a always do this of late take some sorta insurance at double the odds and monitor

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4156

    @nathan-bennett another excellent 1.1 lay there. I wonder if there's some value in removing liability at 1.2 then seeing if you can get 1.3 or 1.4 all the way up?

    Nathan BennettN Stuart WallaceS 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4157

    anyone backing 1.10 AUS is mental right now

    1.10 lay very pleasing and initial 1.4 lay taken most that back

    lets go one more wicket dot balls ...

    OOOOOOOOYYYEEEEAHHHH BABY

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4158

    entered
    AUS LAY 1.11 want double and assess later overs in INNS and weather hold on to some into start of AUS chase

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4159

    every chance see 1.10 ish AUS while bowling
    if Reifer next man out will likely be auto AUS LAY me

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4160

    LAY AUS 1.4 here
    see what happens
    def be taking stake out 1.8

    not liking this at mo
    hedged
    backed runs u158.5

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.