Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.2k Posts 131 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4041

    Expect Nathans asleep but both Asia cup matches have 1.04 pre match favs... lay both?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4042

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Must admit, my brain hurts after spending an evening looking at this..
    So, i thought i'd write down what the scenario is...

    1. Team A reaches 1.1, which the Fairbot then kicks in 3 trades.... 1.1 lay, 1.05 back, and 1.2 Back.
    2. So what happens if it a) bounces around the 1.1 and creates multiple lays - ok, Ian seems to think he might have a answer for this
    3. How do we repeat this ? And also how we ensure trades from previous Bot actions are not left lying around.
    4. How we ensure that multiple lays and backs are not left around.

    I know you guys will say ' its so simple' but i just wanted to make sure we have a solid Bot and just needed a brain stimulus after a brain depleting evening !

    0_1665167040819_2431227e-da6b-42d9-9d32-ba401f962bef-image.png

    Is there a condition when your 1.10 lay is triggered and the 1.05 and 1.20 back bets are placed that should one of those bets be matched the other will cancel?

    If it won't trigger another 1.10 lay until there's no open bets there's the unlikely scenario where you could lay at 1.10, stop loss trigger at 1.05 but then drift to 1.20 and then eventually lose.

    Instead of losing .5 points you could lose 1.5 points.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #4043

    Must admit, my brain hurts after spending an evening looking at this..
    So, i thought i'd write down what the scenario is...

    1. Team A reaches 1.1, which the Fairbot then kicks in 3 trades.... 1.1 lay, 1.05 back, and 1.2 Back.
    2. So what happens if it a) bounces around the 1.1 and creates multiple lays - ok, Ian seems to think he might have a answer for this
    3. How do we repeat this ? And also how we ensure trades from previous Bot actions are not left lying around.
    4. How we ensure that multiple lays and backs are not left around.

    I know you guys will say ' its so simple' but i just wanted to make sure we have a solid Bot and just needed a brain stimulus after a brain depleting evening !

    0_1665167040819_2431227e-da6b-42d9-9d32-ba401f962bef-image.png

    ? D 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4044

    @ian-wylie Thanks Ian.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4045

    @stuart-wallace Hi Stuart, I'm not an expert on this but I think it would be along the lines of the screenshot below. Hopefully I'll have some time over the weekend to have a play about with this.
    0_1665165562848_e9eb84ac-79f2-4808-b218-41d93cadf27d-image.png

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4046

    @ian-wylie said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @dan-mackinnon said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace @Chris-Osborne here's my cricket files. The market would be the match odds and if you add the strategy to automation it should explain the process. The one thing I haven't had a chance to test yet is the "execution" which I've put in at 100. Hopefully it'll continue to execute even if the trade loses rather than stop which seemed to happen when I had "repeat on success". Now I think about it, you might want to extend the time to 60 seconds or longer in chase it keeps bouncing around the 1.1 mark and fires 100 trades!

    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SRG7Txa6Oq5ZPhigIzNQBDikp1oYqbwr?usp=sharing

    Let me know if you can't access the files. It won't let me upload the fairbot files directly

    Hi Dan, you might be able to add a condition to only place a lay at 1.1 if there are no open trades which would hopefully prevent it from firing off loads of lays if the price keeps bouncing about 1.1. So in theory it would only place a lay at 1.1 if the previous back bet at 1.2 had been matched.

    Hi Ian, forgive my ignorance, but after looking at Fairbot Conditions list , do you know how we could do this?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Dan MacKinnon on last edited by
    #4047

    @dan-mackinnon said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace @Chris-Osborne here's my cricket files. The market would be the match odds and if you add the strategy to automation it should explain the process. The one thing I haven't had a chance to test yet is the "execution" which I've put in at 100. Hopefully it'll continue to execute even if the trade loses rather than stop which seemed to happen when I had "repeat on success". Now I think about it, you might want to extend the time to 60 seconds or longer in chase it keeps bouncing around the 1.1 mark and fires 100 trades!

    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SRG7Txa6Oq5ZPhigIzNQBDikp1oYqbwr?usp=sharing

    Let me know if you can't access the files. It won't let me upload the fairbot files directly

    Thanks Dan, i seem to have been able to upload the files onto my Fairbot - just need to get my head around the rest !

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4048

    Looked like it would have been a pretty straightforward trading day, especially on the womens game.

    Did Aus provide any opportunities?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4049

    yeah most go on about the AUS batting line up but sheesh they are real stingy with dot ball bowling
    so skilled

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4050

    1.06 AUS is a LAY
    1.24 be huge for a fill

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4051

    Would love 1.6 AUS and make my book
    All green aus and zero WI

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4052

    I had to go to work so not traded any of it this mornings matches.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4053

    p**s off stark haha what a catch

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4054

    LAY PAK W 1.17
    Want 1.5's here Deepti can do it for IND

    bang there it is
    now lets get odds on IND W and look to green up entire book till 1.1 scenarios

    such a volotile format (cant spell) hense why i often love to take insurance

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4055

    medium LAY AUS 1.12
    took some insurance 1.17 funny

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4056

    small bet AUS 177 or more

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4057

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles damn 1.16 my finger was hovering on the lay wanted two more boundaries ha

    hope this isn't going to be a morning of missed chances! I didn't see Warner going like that... They still have Maxy, Wade, David, Cummins... all hitters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4058

    @matt-ayles damn 1.16 my finger was hovering on the lay wanted two more boundaries ha

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4059

    @nathan-bennett yeah me too. Also, Pak W fell short of par. Good comeback from India. I currently don't see any entry there...

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4060

    @matt-ayles yet to enter

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.