Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4061

    LAY PAK W 1.17
    Want 1.5's here Deepti can do it for IND

    bang there it is
    now lets get odds on IND W and look to green up entire book till 1.1 scenarios

    such a volotile format (cant spell) hense why i often love to take insurance

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4062

    medium LAY AUS 1.12
    took some insurance 1.17 funny

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4063

    small bet AUS 177 or more

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4064

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles damn 1.16 my finger was hovering on the lay wanted two more boundaries ha

    hope this isn't going to be a morning of missed chances! I didn't see Warner going like that... They still have Maxy, Wade, David, Cummins... all hitters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4065

    @matt-ayles damn 1.16 my finger was hovering on the lay wanted two more boundaries ha

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4066

    @nathan-bennett yeah me too. Also, Pak W fell short of par. Good comeback from India. I currently don't see any entry there...

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4067

    @matt-ayles yet to enter

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4068

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    if finch is next out I'm backing aus runs line over
    #forthelasttime ha

    There he goes...

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4069

    Two more boundaries from laying AUS approaching 1.1 ish

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #4070

    Looks like par in the Pak W innings is 145 - 150. Current RR will see them more or less bang on that unless they can up it to 8 or so for the last few overs.

    Aus already on the verge of 1.1 but with alot of batting to come I may wait as there could be an even lower lay available here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4071

    if finch is next out I'm backing aus runs line over
    #forthelasttime ha

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4072

    @matt-ayles 100% no edge right now i might attempt steal a few ticks change of INNS

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4073

    @nathan-bennett can't do them all mate. Understand it's annoying when you miss one but I've learnt the hard way about jumping on something late just because you're annoyed you missed it... lost too much in the past doing that.

    Will certainly continue to monitor the Ind W game though, as there may be another chance.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4074

    @matt-ayles yes well this potential target could be a wait and see could be competitive as late game chaos be great

    christ annoying as missing that IND W lay easy free roll till end of INNS would of been the play grrrr

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4075

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    IND W Sub 1.1 missed bugger

    At what point would you consider backing India? Over 2.0?

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4076

    @nathan-bennett Finch is on my "walking wicket" list with players like Crawley, Roy and Bavuma. Even now he's sticking around, but 2 off 9 in a T20? Come on. Is he just trying to see out the powerplay?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4077

    @matt-ayles WTF is this finch unreal if he plays cup and green doesn't

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4078

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    IND W Sub 1.1 missed bugger

    Yeah me too, was focusing on Aus v WI... although I have to leave for work in an hour so will miss some of the start of the chase.

    There may be other opportunities in the Ind W game to come.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4079

    IND W Sub 1.1 missed bugger

    ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dan MacKinnon
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4080

    @ian-wylie that's a good point. I could add a condition that it only fires if there are no unmatched bets on that market. I think the trouble is it'll bounce up and down so you might lose the first one but then the next 3 go on to win, but if it stops because the first one lost it won't continue, especially with a trailing stop loss

    “Greed moves the goalposts” - Ryan Holiday

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.