Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4121

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @nathan-bennett another excellent 1.1 lay there. I wonder if there's some value in removing liability at 1.2 then seeing if you can get 1.3 or 1.4 all the way up?

    I have wondered this too. Is there any data that we could get from BF that might help us?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4122

    @matt-ayles Whats the general feel about the 1.1 ?
    do you think its a goer for the World Cup ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #4123

    so fed up with work getting in the way of my trading, maybe see if i can get November off too - i can feel there's a big increase in Covid round my way !!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4124

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Bloody tied match!!

    Where's Nathans peanut !?

    There were so many big swings in that match. Windies were 1.03 needing 1 run off 1 ball but ended up losing a wicket instead.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4125

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Bloody tied match!!

    Where's Nathans peanut !?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4126

    Bloody tied match!!

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4127

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    This Windies v NZ tour has been so low scoring. May well be another chance to lay NZ and continue their gift giving series.

    And that they are.

    For transparency for those watching, I didn't want to wait for 1.1 as didn't feel it would get there until very late so i laid NZ at 1.2, i then removed half liability at 1.4, the other half and 1.6 and then locked in and even profit spread at 1.8

    As i type this the Windies have lost 2 wickets in 2 balls so NZ have crashed back into 1.25. Windies need 60 off 64 balls which is very achievable but are now 4 down... McClean might need to stick around for a bit but there's a fair chance this drifts again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4128

    This Windies v NZ tour has been so low scoring. May well be another chance to lay NZ and continue their gift giving series.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4129

    Wow two drop catches in final over haha WI up to muppets

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4130

    this is awesome thanks finch for throwing wicket away greened u p a stack

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4131

    @matt-ayles a always do this of late take some sorta insurance at double the odds and monitor

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4132

    @nathan-bennett another excellent 1.1 lay there. I wonder if there's some value in removing liability at 1.2 then seeing if you can get 1.3 or 1.4 all the way up?

    Nathan BennettN Stuart WallaceS 3 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4133

    anyone backing 1.10 AUS is mental right now

    1.10 lay very pleasing and initial 1.4 lay taken most that back

    lets go one more wicket dot balls ...

    OOOOOOOOYYYEEEEAHHHH BABY

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4134

    entered
    AUS LAY 1.11 want double and assess later overs in INNS and weather hold on to some into start of AUS chase

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4135

    every chance see 1.10 ish AUS while bowling
    if Reifer next man out will likely be auto AUS LAY me

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #4136

    LAY AUS 1.4 here
    see what happens
    def be taking stake out 1.8

    not liking this at mo
    hedged
    backed runs u158.5

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4137

    I've been pondering about outrights as well.

    The way I'm looking at it there are 4 semi-final spots up for grabs...3 of these are most likely going to be Aus, Eng and India which leave one spot open for a good move.

    I'm looking at that spot being filled from SA, Pak or NZ (in that order) and they've got some juicy odds. Out of those teams SA will probably be best suited to Aus conditions and are probably under-rated (even though Bavuma is a liability).

    So I may go in on SA

    And wait to see if Aus get in trouble and get on them at higher odds 🤞

    0_1664950828999_Odds #2.png

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4138

    AUS WI
    AUS justifiably almost 5's on
    If bat first i'' be laying pre game for 3-5 tick attempt

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4139

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Changing the subject:
    World Cup Outright...

    Australia, at home, 3.9? Screams value to me... however, please offer thoughts.

    hmmm, looks a good price, however 2 of first 3 games are v NZ and ENG ,probably 2 of top 4 teams. Might be wise to trade the games.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4140

    Changing the subject:
    World Cup Outright...

    Australia, at home, 3.9? Screams value to me... however, please offer thoughts.

    Stuart WallaceS ? 2 Replies Last reply
    2

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.