Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #2681

    @andy awaiting a 1.1 ish entry with runs line first INNS winnings

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2682

    Watching the markets on the Stars Sixers game, I know what you mean @Nathan-Bennett about "don't think, just bet". The swings are just incredible.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #2683

    @andy said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Stars lay 1.4. looking for 1.8.

    Should have landed?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard FutterR Offline
    Richard FutterR Offline
    Richard Futter
    wrote on last edited by
    #2684

    I'm liking the draw lay at around 1.7 here. Reckon we'll get a winner here - or very close to it.

    Professional Betfair Trader since 2004 - The Master of Cricket Markets

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2685

    Stars lay 1.4. looking for 1.8.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #2686

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    STARS 172+

    old stoinis worried about his stats
    get going muppet leave the gum alone ha

    better

    6 off 6 req
    now
    6 off 4 req
    my remote is in danger

    i was due
    something
    phew

    I scratched there, needed under 171 for a great result. My remote hated Jordan! Lol

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #2687

    @stuart-wallace-0 would love pak sub 5 consider going against
    be tempted back draw for a swing if Sarafaz next out

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #2688

    STARS 172+

    old stoinis worried about his stats
    get going muppet leave the gum alone ha

    better

    6 off 6 req
    now
    6 off 4 req
    my remote is in danger

    i was due
    something
    phew

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2689

    Aus team selection geared up for bowling 4th and 5th day but pitch only a day and a half old. Can definitely see SA collapse, but Elgar due some runs. If SA can get past the new ball they can put on runs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #2690

    @matt-ayles 196 overs to be bowled
    Lyon bowl heaps

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2691

    Think all 3 results are possible in NZ but Pakistan will fancy these runs with these 2 at the crease. If wickets fall it'll become a block/leave fest and then it'll just be on NZ to get the tail.

    Setup interestingly.

    In Aus, am i right in thinking weathers ok for rest of the match? Might flip the market round, big draw lay.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #2692

    @matt-ayles mental shot by PAK wicket
    was two quick wickets
    i managed 3.6
    Mr dot ball at the crease with Mr run a ball

    If sarfaraz next out i'm going to speck draw at say 6 and get out at 4 again

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2693

    Most runs SA have hit so far was 204 in Melbourne. Do we think they beat that here? They'd currently need 276 to avoid the follow on.

    I think it'll come down to the first innings score. Skittle them out for

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2694

    What made the NZ draw odds shoot up to 4 then instantly back down to 2.6 again?

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #2695

    Match fixing ?
    I'll take it
    Boom that's me 80% greened / banked up
    Roll the rest

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #2696

    PAK NZ
    F......ark being a batter right now

    come on wickets

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #2697

    @andy gut the 1.7 starts slightly higher in morning but yeah unphased big trading at the mo
    Lyon will bowl 40 a day ha

    there be a point to fire a lay surely

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #2698

    @nathan-bennett surely you gotta declare overnight yeh?? Khawaja on 195 tho says maybe not. On this deck despite SA batting being rubbish, do SA make AUS bat again? Hard to see a result.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #2699

    ok
    DRAW LAY more 2.22 (want 4's)
    and small
    BACK PAK 5.6 (want 3's)

    see what happens

    Just typing bang stake out on PAK back bet at 4
    Babar out

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #2700

    day 3 is done !!! backed some draw 1.62 see if get 10-12 ticks on reaction
    ABORTED This

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.