Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to Luke Ridger on last edited by
    #11301

    @luke-ridger are you meaning to lay again mate when it crashes?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Luke RidgerL Offline
    Luke RidgerL Offline
    Luke Ridger
    wrote on last edited by
    #11302

    Windies have done really well. Draw about to crash so I'm riding on the back of it . Risk is high but expecting no play tomorrow .

    Trading all my X's for your XO's

    James WoodroffeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Luke Ridger on last edited by
    #11303

    @luke-ridger said in 2020 Cricket Trading Thread - Updated Thread:

    Windies look mentally shot . 3 down by the evening is my guess.
    I very much hope you’re right

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Luke RidgerL Offline
    Luke RidgerL Offline
    Luke Ridger
    wrote on last edited by
    #11304

    Windies look mentally shot . 3 down by the evening is my guess.

    Trading all my X's for your XO's

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Luke RidgerL Offline
    Luke RidgerL Offline
    Luke Ridger
    wrote on last edited by
    #11305

    Nonsense this batting from England . I do not think there is any reason to not be atleast 3 runs an over .

    Trading all my X's for your XO's

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #11306

    What the heck are England doing here?! Quick runs or get out surely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #11307

    gees light a factor surely declare asap ideally with 15-20 overs to go been best, oddly slow partnership.. tea soon prob . uppercut myself

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #11308

    @andrew-wooding on cue

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by A Former User
    #11309

    @nathan-bennett i’d ike to see them get a wriggle on now though...

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #11310

    @1.5 almost said england price starting to look fat . intents great for the draw lay

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #11311

    @nathan-bennett defo mate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #11312

    @andrew-wooding always learning

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #11313

    Thanks all. The reassurance and collective thoughts process here is great learning.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Richard FutterR Offline
    Richard FutterR Offline
    Richard Futter
    wrote on last edited by
    #11314

    Yep. I'm loving adding to my lay at under 4's.

    Professional Betfair Trader since 2004 - The Master of Cricket Markets

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #11315

    joining the lay the draw party . bowlers looking good lift wickets

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #11316

    laid draw at 3.75.
    ball is already moving & new ball is due

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by
    #11317

    @james-woodroffe Yea that helps loads, thanks.

    Think I should do some reading and then watch how the markets move on this one. But if there is such a low chance of a draw I can see this being a way to make some good green.

    Loads of punters put money on test matches, my brother included in that 🙂

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to James Woodroffe on last edited by A Former User
    #11318

    @james-woodroffe it does thank you. Just the lack of confidence in my position which comes from experience.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James WoodroffeJ Offline
    James Woodroffe
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #11319

    @matt-wood hey mate they will shorten more than likely the longer England bat. Currently 4.60 if they lose quick early wickets it will blow out to (hypothetically) let’s say 7.60.
    Given the incredibly low percentage of test matches that end in draws we want England to bat well today and for that draw price to shorten. With rain forecast for a bit of tomorrow it will likely shorten more. Baring in mind that they make up time lost over the course of the test match you need to have a LOT of rain and overs lost to really make the draw feasible. The West Indies have to also bat last which is never easy. Test matches can turn rapidly and there are lots of opportunities over 5 days to lock in green. Hope that makes sense.

    ? Matt WoodM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #11320
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.