Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Horse Racing Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Horse Racing
important
6.4k Posts 173 Posters 681.1k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6201

    @alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    This guy appears to have done some work on "Lay The Field"

    http://false-favourites.co.uk/blog/laying-the-field-with-this-deadly-effective-strategy-for-low-risk-profits/

    He's been playing around with different numbers... We need to know where the numbers drop to in each race right?

    Think you have hit the nail on the head, if we can find races where 3 or 4 can be matched inplay , but what is that number (odds)and what strike rate would you need to be profitable?

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6202

    @alan-steward No I meant getting at least 2 matched. Trouble with 2.0 is you don't get a thing unless you can match 3 and every loss is obv a full point. I've tried it before but not been as choosy with race types. Worth tracking though along with everything else.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by A Former User
    #6203

    @richard-latimer do you mean Lay odds of 2? This could be easier to match couldn't it... Meaning more matched ='s more profit yeah?

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #6204

    @martin-futter what kind of strike rate have you had so far for a minimum of 2?

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6205

    I covered every race at Tampa tonight (I had to set and forget a few). Only 2 losses and finished in profit overall thanks to the race with 4 matches. Decent.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    wrote on last edited by
    #6206

    well 2 was better than nothing! small profit there

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6207

    Love the little trumpet fanfare at the start of the races.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #6208

    This guy appears to have done some work on "Lay The Field"

    http://false-favourites.co.uk/blog/laying-the-field-with-this-deadly-effective-strategy-for-low-risk-profits/

    He's been playing around with different numbers... We need to know where the numbers drop to in each race right?

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #6209

    I wonder what the highest number of horses ever matched at 1.8 inplay is for one race.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #6210

    @martin-futter Yes mate I can work on something... Not a problem at all

    Am just getting my head around the whole thing of "Lay The Field"

    Let me know what you want and I'll work on it, will message you so as not to clutter this thread 👍

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #6211

    @martin-futter triffic haha

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #6212

    @richard-latimer we can pretty much guarantee one match in the 9pm now 😄

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6213

    @alan-steward According to the graphs Capoeira traded at 1.7 for a small amount

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6214

    @alan-steward you're a spreadsheet whizz are you going to track the ones that don't qualify and see if we can edit the parameters?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6215

    @alan-steward by the graphs it was 4. Typical haha

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6216

    0_1586029068810_2030.JPG

    Richard LatimerR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard LatimerR Offline
    Richard Latimer
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6217

    @alan-steward seemed like loads went under 1.8 there

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6218

    Just got 4 matched on the 8.30. 😊

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #6219

    Put it in simulation mode

    3 Horses matched in simulation mode lol

    Richard LatimerR MartinM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    james everard
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #6220

    @martin-futter Def not only 8 runners and odds criteria not available 21.00pm though is good atm

    https://1drv.ms/x/s!AgAENvh6njGR8wT6kcGOYgHyGFQq?e=Zo3Tic

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.