Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Staking

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Chat
5 Posts 3 Posters 89 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris KingC Offline
    Chris KingC Offline
    Chris King
    wrote on last edited by Chris King
    #1

    I’m testing a new staking method by using the most up to date stake percentage for each trade, trade to trade you could say, rather than a monthly or quarterly stake increase. For example:

    Taking odds of 2.0 per trade(no commission)

    £100 bank, 2% stake per trade starting at £2

    Trade 1 wins, increasing bank to £102
    Next trade stake value £2.04 (2% of £102)

    Trade 2 wins, increasing bank to £104.04
    Next trade stake value £2.08 (2% of £104.04)

    Trade 3 loses, decreasing bank to £101.96
    Next trade stake value £2.03 (2% of £101.96)

    And so on..

    Does anyone else use this staking method?

    P Stephen HancoxS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Chris KingC Offline
    Chris KingC Offline
    Chris King
    replied to Patrik Mellqvist on last edited by
    #2

    @Patrik-Mellqvist Thank you, that is a good bit of reading for me later on, written by people with a lot of experience.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris KingC Offline
    Chris KingC Offline
    Chris King
    replied to Stephen Hancox on last edited by
    #3

    @Stephen-Hancox Hi thanks for the feedback, of course, yes every loss on this strategy is also at the highest value. I would be using this on higher strike rates but looking at it from this perspective isn’t something I’d given much time to, thanks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stephen HancoxS Offline
    Stephen HancoxS Offline
    Stephen Hancox
    replied to Chris King on last edited by
    #4

    @Chris-King Hi Chris, staking at odds of 2.0, if you win 50 of 100 trades then you would break even. However, using the method you suggested, your losers would always be at the highest stakes and the winners would be less than the losers.

    Starting bank £1000, so £20 stake

    Trade 1 wins, increasing bank to £1020
    Next trade stake value £20.40 (2% of £1020)

    Trade 2 loses, bank now £999.60
    Next trade stake value £19.99

    Trade 3 wins, bank now £1019.59
    Next trade stake value £20.39

    Trade 4 loses, bank now £999.20

    Sio effectively you'd be slowly losing money on a break even strategy. Hope that makes sense.

    Chris KingC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Patrik Mellqvist
    replied to Chris King on last edited by
    #5

    @Chris-King said in Staking:

    I’m testing a new staking method by using the most up to date stake percentage for each trade, trade to trade you could say, rather than a monthly or quarterly stake increase. For example:

    Taking odds of 2.0 per trade(no commission)

    £100 bank, 2% stake per trade starting at £2

    Trade 1 wins, increasing bank to £102
    Next trade stake value £2.04 (2% of £102)

    Trade 2 wins, increasing bank to £104.04
    Next trade stake value £2.08 (2% of £104.04)

    Trade 3 loses, decreasing bank to £101.96
    Next trade stake value £2.03 (2% of £101.96)

    And so on..

    Does anyone else use this staking method?

    I know one similar method where you increase and decrease based upon the bankroll and is from an old known sports document - if I understand you I think that is a very decent approach - I will try to upload it so you can read the original -

    400
    400
    400
    400

    That is how you split the bankroll into four parts or blocks ...
    When you for example have made 200+ or 400+ you increase the overall parts of the bankroll

    with 200+ extra 50 on each block

    450
    450
    450
    450

    Increase unit size and so on ...
    And something similar if you lose you decrease ... see the original document ...

    MMPSH3.pdf

    Chris KingC 1 Reply Last reply
    1

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.