Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

*****New Football Thread*****

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
important
4.7k Posts 103 Posters 67.1k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by Richard Latimer
    #741

    @Matt-Wood said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    @Richard-Latimer Thanks Richard,

    I think I was falling into a similar trap you describe and have taken kinda the same path you have in keeping the filtering to a minimum and making it sensible as Alex suggested.

    I know you keep massive spreadies, do you keep traking a poor league and add it in if it turns good later down the line? Also do you filter first or remove bad leagues first? I have found doing these two things in different orders can ave a massive effect on my results. Not sure if thee is a 'best' option though.

    I started off with all leagues which are 30+ on the global corruption index. That rules out the real bottom feeders and I didn't even track them.

    After that, even the ones failing I will keep tracking for later with a few exceptions.

    I've recently binned Estonia completely from my home lay, that and Bosnia. Sometimes it's liquidity, sometimes it's a feel all is not quite right.

    South Korea I have found to be crap though and I'm still tracking them.

    On my 3 most promising filters at present I've got between 12-16 filters, most looking very broadly. This gives me plenty of scope to change things later and really see

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #742

    @Martin I know! stupid right. All the more for us though 🙂

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Richard Latimer on last edited by
    #743

    @Richard-Latimer Thanks Richard,

    I think I was falling into a similar trap you describe and have taken kinda the same path you have in keeping the filtering to a minimum and making it sensible as Alex suggested.

    I know you keep massive spreadies, do you keep traking a poor league and add it in if it turns good later down the line? Also do you filter first or remove bad leagues first? I have found doing these two things in different orders can ave a massive effect on my results. Not sure if thee is a 'best' option though.

    Catch that Green!

    Richard LatimerR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard Latimer
    wrote on last edited by
    #744

    In my current home lay I have combined a max 2 stats although going forward I won't even do that. It's just much easier to analyse when you're looking at each stat in turn.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard LatimerR Online
    Richard Latimer
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #745

    @Matt-Wood said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    @Alex-Rendell Thanks for the reply Alex.

    I have 1500 games total so not a massive amount of data but a fair bit.
    I am trying to be very careful about the danger of back fitting the data with over tweaking, as you say this would in effect ruin the strategy. I have limited myself to making 2 or 3 sensible tweaks like you have suggested, and those are usually around an odds range or goals scored.

    I like your idea of each league having its own rules and I might adopt this long term. Dont think I have enough data on most of the leagues to properly look into that yet. One for the future though certainly.

    What I have been doing is trying 2 or 3 sensible tweaks recording the results, then resetting the data and trying some other sensible tweaks. It would seem that I am stuck trying to find a set of rules that gathers all of the profits from all of the leagues in one go. I honestly dont think this is possible so I have to make a choice on what 'best' is. Max profits or max ROI for example.

    I think I will take your idea of each league to its own rules going forward. How many years do you take data from each league as being 'relevant'? More than 5 years back for example?

    For my tuppence worth I found it to be really back fitting when I was combining stats, removing random things/numbers.

    What I have made myself do this time is only remove numbers at the top or bottom end of each scale. Sometimes I think numbers are too high and sometimes too low. Even if I remove I mostly still collect the data so I can add it back much later.

    Keeping your filter broad and tweaking it before placing trades is the way to go. Easier to see what's going on. I also use the excel smart filter as this helps me massively zoom in on potential issues.

    Trick is seeing what is variance and what is just a case of where general improvement can be found.

    Trading Spreadsheet linked below
    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3gnk1vku1krkoyfcq37y6/Trading-Bible.xlsx?rlkey=01eqhp8u73s61iy2s814sqfll&dl=0

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by Martin
    #746

    @Matt-Wood the internet says LTD is dead? Try telling that to Ryan!

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Alex Rendell on last edited by
    #747

    @Alex-Rendell Thanks for the reply Alex.

    I have 1500 games total so not a massive amount of data but a fair bit.
    I am trying to be very careful about the danger of back fitting the data with over tweaking, as you say this would in effect ruin the strategy. I have limited myself to making 2 or 3 sensible tweaks like you have suggested, and those are usually around an odds range or goals scored.

    I like your idea of each league having its own rules and I might adopt this long term. Dont think I have enough data on most of the leagues to properly look into that yet. One for the future though certainly.

    What I have been doing is trying 2 or 3 sensible tweaks recording the results, then resetting the data and trying some other sensible tweaks. It would seem that I am stuck trying to find a set of rules that gathers all of the profits from all of the leagues in one go. I honestly dont think this is possible so I have to make a choice on what 'best' is. Max profits or max ROI for example.

    I think I will take your idea of each league to its own rules going forward. How many years do you take data from each league as being 'relevant'? More than 5 years back for example?

    Catch that Green!

    Richard LatimerR A 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alex Rendell
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #748

    @Matt-Wood if you have a basic strategy/filter that is performing well then you're definitely on to something, so use that as your foundation. The problem with over-tweaking or back-fitting the data you've accumulated is that you're basically removing the variance and leaving yourself with potentially unreliable results. How many selections do you have overall? With the changes you're making to optimise the strategy, do they 'make sense' or are they just random and happen to have improved the bottom line for no apparent reason? Simple filtering such as odds ranges (over 2.5 goals and home odds markets) make perfect sense, for example, as these will 100% have an impact on the likelihood of a draw happening.
    I personally adopt a different approach for each that league I'm trading, as they are all unique and behave differently - if this is going to be your main strategy and you have the time to dedicate to it, then I'd focus on each individual league (assuming there is enough data), work out which strategy works best and adapt your LTD approach accordingly.
    This might not have actually answered your questions but hopefully it's been of some us!

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #749

    Afternoon all.

    Just wondering if any of you suffer from 'analysis paralysis' at all and if yes how and what do you do to move past it?

    I ask since I am struggling with it now. I had an idea for a LTD (even though the internet says its dead 🙄 ) for the summer leagues since I don't do much in the summer.

    I have collected a fair amount of data now and just betting every game blind it has made 50pts.
    I know with a couple of sensible tweaks to the data that return can double. The problem I am stuck with now is that I have become obsessed with maximising the return and therefor won't commit to making the change.

    For example if I apply a couple of filters to the data Ireland is in good profit for the summer but with a couple of different filters it is in a slight loss. This is reversed for other leagues. Repeat this over and over across multiple attempts and I have become stuck with trying to find a way to extract the maximum winning leagues in one go, even though I know there is probably not a 'best' way.

    Just curious as to how others find their way through this sort of thing.

    Cheers in advance.

    Catch that Green!

    A MartinM Richard LatimerR S 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Simon BatesS Offline
    Simon BatesS Offline
    Simon Bates
    replied to Alex Rendell on last edited by Simon Bates
    #750

    @Alex-Rendell thanks for getting back to me, so if the game is a draw, I'll lose the £10 stake?

    Edit...
    I get it now, thank you, I understand now

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alex Rendell
    replied to Simon Bates on last edited by Alex Rendell
    #751

    @Simon-Bates in the example you've given, if Walsall win, you'll lose £60...if it's a draw then the bet is void, and if Walsall lose then you'll win your £10 stake (less commission). Hope this helps!

    Simon BatesS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Simon BatesS Offline
    Simon BatesS Offline
    Simon Bates
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #752

    Morning all, I've been trying and trialing different trades on Betfair the last few weeks just seeing how they work and how I can use them for trading.
    I've seen the trade 'draw no bet' I know how this type of bet works but what I can't get my head round is the lay side of it.
    I'll use this Walsall game as an example
    Screenshot_20240924_101204_Exchange.jpg
    If I back £10 on Walsall, I'll get £56 if they win, I'll get my £10 back if the game is a draw, and if they lose I'll lose my £10.

    I just can't get my head around the lay side, if the game isn't a draw, do I get my stake back, cos the trade is draw no bet, I know it's probably simple but it's giving me a mental block at the moment 🤔😂

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva Anderson
    wrote on last edited by
    #753

    Going for SHG's in the:

    Monaco v Le Havre match

    Brighton v Notts Forest match

    Heading out for dinner now!

    le jeu avant tout

    Am Yisrael Chai

    When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
    But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game...

    1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alastair Todd
    wrote on last edited by
    #754

    Those Finnish league matches seem to spend a long time being 'suspended'. I might drop the Finnish leagues altogether.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva Anderson
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #755

    @Matt-Wood said in *****New Football Thread*****:

    @Martin probably something to do with Utd being awful 😞

    Good to see. Long may it continue

    le jeu avant tout

    Am Yisrael Chai

    When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
    But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #756

    @Martin probably something to do with Utd being awful 😞

    Catch that Green!

    Akiva AndersonA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Akiva Anderson on last edited by
    #757

    @Akiva-Anderson not sure how there was not a goal in that one!

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva AndersonA Offline
    Akiva Anderson
    wrote on last edited by
    #758

    SHG in the Crystal Palace v Man United match

    le jeu avant tout

    Am Yisrael Chai

    When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
    But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game...

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Alex Rule on last edited by
    #759

    @Alex-Rule it can be good to get in just before KO but not always practical

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Alex RuleA Offline
    Alex RuleA Offline
    Alex Rule
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #760

    @Martin got ya, I'll try and take a screen shot of the next one and see how it goes.

    Do you prefer to get on early or try and get on 15 mins before or so once the market is fully formed?

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.