soccer-scanner-in-play-stats
-
Do you use a soccer scanner?
Because I notice there is a difference in accuracy between free brands.
Tested real-time data with Flashscore, Sofascore, and AI score and got different outputs and delays.
So the simple conclusion was that the most accurate is Flashscore and if using a free alternative stick to one.Also tested the pay version but got disappointed when one game did not give any output in-play stats, but Flashscore did with the same game.
This made me question why I should pay £14 each month for that service and cancel the subscription.The highlight is that I want to have a pay version that can be more accurate than free third-party software as Flaschscore.
The moment is in the trading and scaling and your strategic relays on in-play stats to enter and exit trade moment.
So that is the reason to find accuracy and trusted service.Do you know what others use with success or what you self use with success?
Cheers Patrik
-
I use Flashscore for tennis trading in play stats . Very accurate and scores are only slightly behind bet 365. Bet 365 is my scoreboard and Flashscore for in play. It is very reliable
-
@Patrik-Mellqvist said in soccer-scanner-in-play-stats:
But you are wrong when 900 mbit versus 100 mbit
Because there is the machines that are between and the operator network that Will slow down processI agree, but you chose to highlight your connection speed. I would say it either doesn't matter at all, or if it does and you want to try and make a case for it, you would need to be using the fastest connection possible, or test using multiple connections.
-
@Adam said in soccer-scanner-in-play-stats:
Not sure I understand the concept tbh.
You're basically writing a product comparison article to compare various paid services, to save others the cost of signing up themselves to form their own opinion. Instead, they'll pay you?
You're also focusing on the delay time, which may not be the number 1 concern to others. You're also only using a 100Mbit connection (my home connection is 900Mbit). Your own connection speed also isn't the only thing that will determine the delay, for example your proximity to the service's servers, etc.
What are the "hard questions" people are afraid of and "hidden agendas", that are stopping them from being transparent?
Ultimately this could be a useful article, but it's going to be very subjective and with regard to other people, there's still going to be a lot of "your mileage may vary". I'd read it, but would probably still want to try some of the products myself to see how it all related to my usage.
This is fine and basically all reviews are that way, but it sounds like you're portraying it as an objective analysis of some kind when it's going to be impossible to make it that way.
Obviously we have no "in-play scanner" type product on offer either, so I promise I'm not part of whatever conspiracy you think is going on to hide the truth about in-play scanner delays from the world!
No missunderstand me right
I Will show with articel that pay service time delay are larger then free options with real comparison testingLets say i test one month with three top services
That might be total fee cost 60£Then i Will sell the articel for 60£ to the first taker
Maybe sport forum in SwedenThen i got my money back
Maybe strange for some when i have one year of income as investment foundBut i stop serve by silverplate for no one is giving me the hard core truth about things so why should i
Yes you are right about individual set up
NoteYes you are right subjective
NoteBut you are wrong when 900 mbit versus 100 mbit
Because there is the machines that are between and the operator network that Will slow down processIf 30 sec delay or more for me
Will not change with pay version service
If i change to 1000 mbit
For ping and up and down with service set up
And my home set up Will stop thatThe only two things that work
One watcing real game and phone with partner home trading with fast and zero delay
Or radio waves -
Not sure I understand the concept tbh.
You're basically writing a product comparison article to compare various paid services, to save others the cost of signing up themselves to form their own opinion. Instead, they'll pay you?
You're also focusing on the delay time, which may not be the number 1 concern to others. You're also only using a 100Mbit connection (my home connection is 900Mbit). Your own connection speed also isn't the only thing that will determine the delay, for example your proximity to the service's servers, etc.
What are the "hard questions" people are afraid of and "hidden agendas", that are stopping them from being transparent?
Ultimately this could be a useful article, but it's going to be very subjective and with regard to other people, there's still going to be a lot of "your mileage may vary". I'd read it, but would probably still want to try some of the products myself to see how it all related to my usage.
This is fine and basically all reviews are that way, but it sounds like you're portraying it as an objective analysis of some kind when it's going to be impossible to make it that way.
Obviously we have no "in-play scanner" type product on offer either, so I promise I'm not part of whatever conspiracy you think is going on to hide the truth about in-play scanner delays from the world!
-
@Patrik-Mellqvist like you say the main advantage is time saving and some of them have extra bells and whistles.
I find Bet365 works fine for what I need inplay.
-
True or False: The Value of Soccer Scanners
I recently came across an article in Swedish promoting free soccer scanners, and to be honest, they were worthless compared to free options like Bet365. It's frustrating when people write about "top free soccer scanners" but avoid addressing the most critical feature: the delay times in real-time data.
After some testing, my question became whether all soccer scanners have longer time delays compared to Bet365. And, from what I discovered, it seems like they do. None of the other so-called top services, free or otherwise, came even close. In fact, the delay times could differ by over 30 seconds!
Why Pay for What Doesn’t Matter?
This brings me to the key issue: why should we pay for features that don’t matter? The primary factor in a soccer scanner is reducing delay time to a minimum, and if Bet365’s free service outperforms the competition in this area, what’s the point? Sure, free services can’t compete with Bet365’s high-end, high-tech customer support, but it makes you wonder—how do paid versions compare?
To find out, we need to look beyond free versus free comparisons and test the pay-version soccer scanners against Bet365 and the market’s other top free options.
The Optimal Setup
For this testing, I will be using a 100 Mbit fiber internet connection. The connection will be made through a cable directly from the wall to the router and then into a high-end gaming computer. No WiFi will be involved, as the goal is to minimize any potential delay time. With this setup, everything on my end is optimal for accurate testing, with no further adjustments needed. This ensures the data collected from the scanners will be as reliable as possible, leaving no room for external interference.
The Comparison Test
Here’s where things get interesting. I plan to test the best free soccer scanners head-to-head and make a ranked list (1, 2, 3, and so on) based on performance and delay times. After that, I’ll pay for a monthly subscription to one of the paid versions and compare its delay time against the top free versions. Only then can we get a clear picture of whether paid services are worth the investment—or if they’re just a false positive.
Take, for example, Betfair Bot Manager, which includes a paid soccer scanner option with real-time filtering for serious traders. Is it all just hype, or does it truly provide value?
Breaking It Down
This is the article you’ve been looking for, and you won’t find it anywhere else on the internet. Why? Because most people avoid the hard questions due to conflicts of interest—financial interests, power dynamics, you name it. But I’m here to offer transparency.
The cost of this investigation? It’s simple: the subscription fees I’ll pay for the paid soccer scanners will be reflected in the article itself.
Transparency for the Community
This article won’t have any hidden agendas. No companies, no outside forces—just one trader sharing insights with another. But I will charge a small fee for the article, purely to cover the cost of the subscriptions necessary to do the test. It’s a win-win for both me and the community.
Your Thoughts?
If you have any suggestions or thoughts regarding this article, feel free to leave a comment. I'm open to feedback and keen to hear what the community thinks about this experiment!
-
@Patrik-Mellqvist yeah always got on well with Bet365
-
-
@GREGORIOS-KARASHIALIS said in soccer-scanner-in-play-stats:
@Patrik-Mellqvist i got bared from them
Not a issue
Any family member and deposit 10Then only use for in-play stats
Cheers
-
@Patrik-Mellqvist i got bared from them
-
@GREGORIOS-KARASHIALIS said in soccer-scanner-in-play-stats:
@Patrik-Mellqvist i use sofascore & fotmob…. What’s your thoughts
Well Martin and Ryan are PRO and both say 365
So i will try it outGood for them
Then good for meHave a nice day
-
@Patrik-Mellqvist i use sofascore & fotmob…. What’s your thoughts
-
@Patrik-Mellqvist always used Bet365 found it to be really good and of course free!
