Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The BTC Horse Racing Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Horse Racing
important
6.4k Posts 173 Posters 681.1k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • John FolanJ Offline
    John FolanJ Offline
    John Folan
    replied to Greg Mitchell on last edited by
    #1141

    @greg-mitchell said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @lee-colvin said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    Brilliant Feb for John’s SOL strategy folks eh? I ended the month just over 14.25 points up laying to a one point liability, and I missed out on a few winners as well, phenomenal return indeed.

    Thanks John for a cracking strategy 👍🏼

    Thanks also to the three BTC boys for bringing it all together, what a brilliant community this has turned out to be 💪🏼

    jesus i made 2.5 points, its incredible how different people get different results, have to say its getting a bit frustrating, always seem to be 2 steps behind

    I've just checked my bot results v the software (I'm using BFBM), for February"

    The Software shows 67 bets with an overall profit of 14.3 points and a strike rate of 63%
    My Bot shows shows 68 bets with an overall profit of 16.5 points and a strike rate of 65%

    57 of the bets are on both the bot and the software.
    Of the 10 bets that are on the software but not the bot, 8 of them are showing odds of 1.8 or 2.4, so very close to the threshold, probably explains why the bot didn't fire.
    Of the 11 bets on the bot but not on the software, 7 of them are showing odds of 1.8 or 2.4, so very close to the threshold, probably explains why they are not on the software.

    I'm not sure why the 2 missing from the bot and the 5 missing from the software occurred, both variances account for 2 pts profit, but I figure as long as its profitable it doesn't really matter

    Exactly what I’ve been saying. It’s the principle that’s important. As long as you are close you will be profitable. Most of my differences are due to being on the odds border at either end. Got one extra that I have no explanation for having. I looked briefly and then decided I didn’t care anymore 🤣🤣🤣

    Read the first post on both threads.

    Horse Trading Resources
    https://forum.betfairtradingcommunity.com/topic/1111/john-s-horse-trading-resources

    BfBotmanager
    https://forum.betfairtradingcommunity.com/topic/2915/bfbotmanager-automation-discussion

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg Mitchell
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1142

    @nick-allan

    0_1677759927568_johns-short-odds_V2.baf

    Try this

    So:

    You have this set to fire between 10 secs and 9 seconds from the start time, this should be 10 seconds to 0 seconds to match the software. The software is basically saying that if the odds are between 1.8 and 2.4 anytime between 10 seconds from the Official Start Time and the Official Start Time then place the bet. You only have a 1 second window.

    You have set it fire on EVERY selection, this takes the DSLR factor out, you should be using Nominated selections as given by the software

    Your conditions for the odds and runners were excluding odds of 1.8 and 2.4 and 4 or 15 runners.

    The attached allows up to 2 nominated selections, just takes a moment in the morning to check if its likely the software selections will meet the odds criteria before Nominating them.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to Greg Mitchell on last edited by
    #1143

    @greg-mitchell it fires 10 secs before the offical race start time so for 14:00 at kempton it will fire 13:59:50, of course races rarely start on time

    0_1677758472080_4bfdf478-42f9-491b-a939-22de8c22e8ae-image.png

    Greg MitchellG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg Mitchell
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1144

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    0_1677757926966_Johns short odds.baf

    I will have a look, but why have you set it to fire after the start time? The odds will be moving around like mad, the strategy is set in the software to fire 10 secs before the official start time.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to Greg Mitchell on last edited by
    #1145

    @greg-mitchell 0_1677757926966_Johns short odds.baf

    thanks greg, the only thing i can thiunk off is possibily firing the bot 3 secs after start time that mught make some differences but some didnt fire on 2.3 and 2.2 selections so something is wrong

    Greg MitchellG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg Mitchell
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1146

    @nick-allan If you want to send me your Bet Angel bot file, I will have a look at it for you

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to Greg Mitchell on last edited by
    #1147

    @greg-mitchell i cant understand why BA is not firing, ive tried to see if there are any issues with the log but it just doesnt appear to ID anything. Its so so frustrating, if its 2 pts difference id say oh well that a small variance but 10!!!!! That you cant accept. And I cant sit there all day babysitting the bloody bot. Has anyone got any suggestions at all, ive got 5 months left of BA and I think I will go back to BFBM as there is far more support for that on this forum and of course it links with the software, but I cant justify buying a BFBM license while I have a BA one at the moment.

    There has to be some BA guardian aces out there someone, please, please help 😆

    Greg MitchellG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg MitchellG Offline
    Greg Mitchell
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1148

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @lee-colvin said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    Brilliant Feb for John’s SOL strategy folks eh? I ended the month just over 14.25 points up laying to a one point liability, and I missed out on a few winners as well, phenomenal return indeed.

    Thanks John for a cracking strategy 👍🏼

    Thanks also to the three BTC boys for bringing it all together, what a brilliant community this has turned out to be 💪🏼

    jesus i made 2.5 points, its incredible how different people get different results, have to say its getting a bit frustrating, always seem to be 2 steps behind

    I've just checked my bot results v the software (I'm using BFBM), for February"

    The Software shows 67 bets with an overall profit of 14.3 points and a strike rate of 63%
    My Bot shows shows 68 bets with an overall profit of 16.5 points and a strike rate of 65%

    57 of the bets are on both the bot and the software.
    Of the 10 bets that are on the software but not the bot, 8 of them are showing odds of 1.8 or 2.4, so very close to the threshold, probably explains why the bot didn't fire.
    Of the 11 bets on the bot but not on the software, 7 of them are showing odds of 1.8 or 2.4, so very close to the threshold, probably explains why they are not on the software.

    I'm not sure why the 2 missing from the bot and the 5 missing from the software occurred, both variances account for 2 pts profit, but I figure as long as its profitable it doesn't really matter

    N John FolanJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1149

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @lee-colvin are you using automation? and if you are which one are you using?

    Yeah mate, full automation with John’s strat and I use BFBM for it 👍🏼

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1150

    Is anyone using bet angel guardian automation and missing a number of trades in the short odds lays? I missed 10 entries last month and most where winners , just wondering of anyone else was having issues?
    There a few that aren’t on the software results but they did fire for me, they seem to be close to the 1.8 entry and of course the bsp could have moved by the time the race starts. Sadly theses were all losing trades.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #1151

    @lee-colvin are you using automation? and if you are which one are you using?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #1152

    @lee-colvin said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    Brilliant Feb for John’s SOL strategy folks eh? I ended the month just over 14.25 points up laying to a one point liability, and I missed out on a few winners as well, phenomenal return indeed.

    Thanks John for a cracking strategy 👍🏼

    Thanks also to the three BTC boys for bringing it all together, what a brilliant community this has turned out to be 💪🏼

    jesus i made 2.5 points, its incredible how different people get different results, have to say its getting a bit frustrating, always seem to be 2 steps behind

    Greg MitchellG 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1153

    Brilliant Feb for John’s SOL strategy folks eh? I ended the month just over 14.25 points up laying to a one point liability, and I missed out on a few winners as well, phenomenal return indeed.

    Thanks John for a cracking strategy 👍🏼

    Thanks also to the three BTC boys for bringing it all together, what a brilliant community this has turned out to be 💪🏼

    N 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1154

    @nick-allan
    If you remove that single selection condition the backtest software will treat it like you bet on every horse that matches the filter as it falls into the odds range in that 10 min period. You cant trade it like the backtest does with that condition because until the race has started its not known how many horses will fully meet those criteria (including the odds). My guess is other people are using all horses or the first one that meets the criteria or if more than one is a match at that exact time (so on the ten mins) then dont bet, Or tagging every horse that meets the criteria and actually placing the bet or otherwise closer to the start. There are so many possible ways you can actually try to implement that rule without actually managing to implement it like the backtest.

    Pick one and see how it goes or do what i did and remove the condition so i know the rules i am actually placing bets by are the exact rules the backtest is evaluating its past performance on.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #1155

    @jonathan-jones yeah if you are giving 3 selections how do you decide which horse to trade? of course if 2 are outside the odds range then thats fine but what if all 3 are in the odds range? do you place a back bet on all 3. Just trying to figure out how i set up the bot on BA Guardian

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1156

    @nick-allan

    Pretty much yep.
    The rules in the preset have a condition (under the odds) that it will only trade if only one horse out of the selections matches the criteria and odds. Obviously that not something you can replicate so not sure why its there. Be ok if the time was a shorter range but not over 10 mins. The 3 fav ones is similar. 10 mins is just too long to be making that judgement.

    If you remove both those you will see its still very good but the performance has dropped off in recent months. From there its up to you. Removing AW from the race types helps, re working the course selection (now you have removed AW) will help more etc.

    You dont 'need' to do any of this, its a profitable strategy. I was getting geared up for a portfolio experiment so for me it was important i know i can trade the same rules as a backtest (so get the same trades/results) as the backtest. You can trade it as it is but you you wont get the same results as the backtest (or probably anyone else trading it) because of these little ambiguities.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to David Milligan on last edited by
    #1157

    @david-milligan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @karl-pick yep up about 25% for me since the start of Feb roughly 👍🏼

    How are you trading it david? Are you only placing a bet if the horse selection is the 1st, 2nd or 3rd fav? Or just a straight odds selection (2-7) criteria? And are you trading all selections that the daily selections indicate as long as they between the specified odds range?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #1158

    @karl-pick said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @jonathan-jones Tweak it in what way? Take the 1st, 2nd and 3rd fav out of the automation and just a straight odds selection (2-7) criteria based on the selections?

    I use price only....2 to 6.8 as my guide not on whether its Favourite or Outsider.

    thats probably why the backtest software isnt the same live would you not say? as you could have a selction that 3rd fav in the morning but 5th fav by the time the race starts and therefore the sortware wouldnt place the bet?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Nick Allan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #1159

    @karl-pick said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @david-milligan yeah the back the fav had a good finish, -3 for the month but it seems to be a good strat, not sure about the c and d winner ive just downloaded it for testing but i dont know the rules for the strategy? is it just backing the selection you get on on the daily selections? not like back the fav where you just back the fav
    in say the 14:00 at kempton

    Since January 1st ---- C+D £37.13...per £1 stake for me anyway.

    How are you trading it karl? Are you only placing a bet if the horse selection is the 1st, 2nd or 3rd fav? Or just a straight odds selection (2-7) criteria? And are you trading all selections that the daily selections indicate as long as they between the specified odds range?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nick Allan on last edited by
    #1160

    @nick-allan said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:

    @jonathan-jones Tweak it in what way? Take the 1st, 2nd and 3rd fav out of the automation and just a straight odds selection (2-7) criteria based on the selections?

    I use price only....2 to 6.8 as my guide not on whether its Favourite or Outsider.

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.