Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #3041

    @matt-ayles Good one @Matt-Ayles , yes, i tend to steer clear of the 1.1 after about 12 overs of second innings, as generally, if a team falls to 1.1 then its game gone anyway. However, this one went to 1.1 in first innings, and, to me, thats always a time to lay with very few exceptions. Especially when you have a bowler like Boult about to drop the first over.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #3042

    zampa yet to bowl this getting interesting

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Geoff Hall on last edited by
    #3043

    @geoff-hall this is why we execute this strategy, as it's such low risk. Even if it goes against you your liability will be small if you are sensible.

    To be that price at the midway point it was worth a go, however i would have to be very sure of the batters/bowlers to enter right at the end of the second innings... if you have big 6 hitters in then often 1 maximum can swing your profit, but its about match reading.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #3044

    red turns to green
    reduced risk now by half thats a bonus 2 already

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #3045

    1.1 strikes again !

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Geoff HallG Offline
    Geoff HallG Offline
    Geoff Hall
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #3046

    @matt-ayles wasn't much risk but wasn't much hope either only thing someone said was that stars had good bowling line up...very relevant I would have agreed but market didn't think so ..........

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #3047

    @nathan-bennett I'm in at 1.1 boss, liability removed 1.3 👍🏻

    Geoff HallG 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #3048

    hello john hanse cronje here get me on stars this is a for gone conclusion ha

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #3049

    what just happened

    1.1 ish layers infront .., couldn't fire again when it first got there too much red already ha

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Geoff Hall on last edited by
    #3050

    @geoff-hall there's one... heck of a juggle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Geoff HallG Offline
    Geoff HallG Offline
    Geoff Hall
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #3051

    @matt-ayles yeah the money that laying at the moment is simply risk savvy money hoping for a few early wickets but that's all ...no real expectation at all

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #3052

    interesting article about Power Surge...
    https://www.statsinsider.com.au/blog/bbl/bbl-10-the-stats-and-trends-behind-the-power-surge

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #3053

    love multiple games on Lankan league entries no doubt

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #3054

    gambling small over 119 runs

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Geoff Hall on last edited by
    #3055

    @geoff-hall said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace notice no big lay money coming in yet even at this low point so early ............market appears to expect a train and no confidence in the Stars

    This is great analysis. Thinking exactly the same thing... we're at a very attractive lay price but its not at all attractive in regards the match position.

    Average BBL score here 170. Not even at 100, effectively 8 down. This is what i was talking about the other day as a potential trap game!

    If I'm going to get involved at all it's going to be very low stakes.

    Geoff HallG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #3056

    this is pretty p**s bail end INNS think

    but hugely impressed this bowling

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #3057

    The BBL and LPL in December, and then in January we have BBL, SA20, ILT20 and BPL. Bumper T20 season has begun."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Geoff HallG Offline
    Geoff HallG Offline
    Geoff Hall
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by Geoff Hall
    #3058

    @stuart-wallace notice no big lay money coming in yet even at this low point so early ............market appears to expect a train and no confidence in the Stars

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #3059

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Interesting stuff. Expected boundaries not wickets. Perhaps worth avoiding the surge from a trading perspective?

    i am always wary of Power Surge - seems to bring wickets more times than runs. I might see if i can find any analysis from last season

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #3060

    @matt-ayles two very good crafty bowlers used . always brings intrigue
    reckon can use it better trading wise second INNS

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.