Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by A Former User
    #4221

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Had a throw
    LAY IND 1.06
    HOpefully SA can score 115+ market shouldn’t be worse than current
    Between now and then few boundaries rotate strike be great to take risk out 1.12

    India now 2 down, have reached 1.14...

    Sky then goes back to back 6s and within 2 balls its back to 1.07

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #4222
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4223

    @matt-ayles wouldn’t sweat it class bowling and freak game circumstance
    Help us with game two

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4224

    @nathan-bennett taken the stop loss here. Frustrating, and surprising there hasn't been a SA batter that can get going.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4225

    Dam
    Looks like a bleed
    Gees 130 be competitive this track ha

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4226

    @nathan-bennett yeah seeing how much time there is left I may double down

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4227

    @matt-ayles had a small lay
    If this was the market 5-6 overs to go in INNS I’d launch a lay
    Still could

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4228

    Had a throw
    LAY IND 1.06
    HOpefully SA can score 115+ market shouldn’t be worse than current
    Between now and then few boundaries rotate strike be great to take risk out 1.12

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4229

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @matt-ayles doubt ever see this again

    Cricket gods are sh*tting all over this strategy idea... "you think you have a strategy? Have some of this!"

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4230

    @matt-ayles doubt ever see this again

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4231

    @nathan-bennett said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Christ what am I watching suspect market be very very stale for a while as SA go survival mode
    No entry me yet

    Well this is outrageous!!!

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by
    #4232

    Christ what am I watching suspect market be very very stale for a while as SA go survival mode
    No entry me yet

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by A Former User
    #4233

    Im wondering what needs to happen for a market to hit 1.1 in the first innings... SA are 8/3 after just 11 balls yet India are still at 1.16

    Turns out a 4th wicket will do it! Laying India at 1.09

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Dan MacKinnon on last edited by
    #4234

    @dan-mackinnon said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Just so I'm clear, the strategy is lay the team at 1.1 (with an optional stop loss at 1.05) and exit at 1.2. Repeat as many times as available

    Today we're looking at IND vs SA and PAK vs ENG.

    Yes, thats it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dan MacKinnon
    wrote on last edited by
    #4235

    Just so I'm clear, the strategy is lay the team at 1.1 (with an optional stop loss at 1.05) and exit at 1.2. Repeat as many times as available

    Today we're looking at IND vs SA and PAK vs ENG.

    “Greed moves the goalposts” - Ryan Holiday

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4236

    @nathan-bennett Yeah, hear what you are saying. But feel that the benefits outweigh the negative in this scenario. There are likely to be more real situations when stop loss is needed rather than the scenario mentioned above.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #4237

    @stuart-wallace fair enough . no doubt be occasions that will annoy you like market reacting to a catch in out field only to be dropped and stop loss matched etc
    always element of randomness

    bots are good if not watching i've used occasionally smaller stakes

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Nathan Bennett on last edited by
    #4238

    @nathan-bennett Personally, i would be happier with a stop loss , and even happier if Dan could get a Fairbot to work incorporating a stop loss along with the 1.1 lay.

    Nathan BennettN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Dan MacKinnon on last edited by
    #4239

    @dan-mackinnon Dan, that would be great. If you get it working i might even forgive you being a Palace fan 🙂 but its a big might

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dan MacKinnon
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4240

    @matt-ayles I read you mentioned about trading software. I’ve messed about with a few and as of next month I’m going to start incorporating bots into my trading. I could pretty easily make a bot for this 1.1 strategy and happy to be the Guinea pig to see if it works.

    I’ll likely use Fairbot and once I’ve got everything set up I’ll share it with everyone on here because you can get a 2 week trial. Looking at different bots and VPS it’s not as expensive or daunting as some people think. I reckon you could get a decent setup for £20-£30 per month all in. If it means you’re not missing trades you’ll easily cover those costs.

    I’ll also look into making bots for some of the profitable strategies so hopefully that’ll help cover the costs.

    “Greed moves the goalposts” - Ryan Holiday

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    2

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.