Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTC Cricket Trading Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cricket & Golf Trading
important
13.3k Posts 132 Posters 1.1m Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6101

    @stuart-wallace SA were an easy lay in the end, very similar progression but they weren’t holding up to the pressure, came was over with Van Der Dussen wicket

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #6102

    Really sad to see Eng so toothless in the bowling dept.
    So many tests recently just meandered to draws. They talk about Test match cricket being boring - here you are.!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6103

    @luke-weston said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Definitely LTD when the new ball arrives

    Problem is that Eng dont have any bowlers to exploit the new ball.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #6104

    Fisher gone from 138 clicks in first opening spell to 123 now. !

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6105

    @tom-david-1 said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Big total for Bangladesh, only one succesful chase here higher than this at 318, may well lay SA in play but will wait and see what unfolds

    SA coming back - Worm graph looks remarkably similar.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6106

    Definitely LTD when the new ball arrives

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6107

    Big total for Bangladesh, only one succesful chase here higher than this at 318, may well lay SA in play but will wait and see what unfolds

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #6108

    @stuart-wallace said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @luke-weston said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace I stuck with the draw back in the end. WI have got to score 700 runs to have a shout at winning so their odds are probably accurate now.

    Yeah, you're right Luke, i suppose i wasnt thinking about a WI win at this stage, just maybe a bit of profit to be taken with the WI price shortening . Its already come in from a high (when i saw it ) of 60's to 34 now.

    TBH, thinking about it in hindsight, backing WI was the optimum trade to make, what with 1) A benign pitch and 2) Englands lack of quality bowling and 3) WI such high price. Would have made a killing by backing WI at start of innings, or when their first wicket fell, but as usual hindsight is a wonderful thing ! And a mental note made for the next Test.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Stuart Wallace
    #6109

    @luke-weston said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace I stuck with the draw back in the end. WI have got to score 700 runs to have a shout at winning so their odds are probably accurate now.

    Yeah, you're right Luke, i suppose i wasnt thinking about a WI win at this stage, just maybe a bit of profit to be taken with the WI price sortening . Its already come in from a high (when i saw it ) of 60's to 34 now.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6110

    @matt-ayles said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    @stuart-wallace given how easy its been for us to bat and our 3rd choice bowling attack, how many overs of wicketless cricket would you wait?

    Hi Matt,
    Sorry,been busy at work, and just seen this.
    Personally, i would be looking to start making some decisions some 10 overs in today. Firstly, see if there are any inroads this first hour, and then can assess from there.
    One thing that i have heard people say is that this is going to turn on days 4 and 5, and so far, Permaul and Leach have both found some (slow) turn - and they are not the biggest spinners by any means. So, this could become tricky to bat then, so the LTD will still become relevant.
    Scenario: WI bat for another 4 sessions, and score a total of 400, then England will still be 110 ahead with 2 sessions left in day 4 where England could maybe look to get a lead of 350, thus being able (at a stretch,i know, but possible) to put WI back in again for 30 mins at end of Day 4. I wouldnt see Windies surviving tbh.
    Also, last 7 Tests at Barbados have all had results.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6111

    @stuart-wallace I stuck with the draw back in the end. WI have got to score 700 runs to have a shout at winning so their odds are probably accurate now.

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6112

    True, looks like there might be a bit of spice in this pitch down the line. I will definitely be looking for a spot to ltd at some point too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #6113

    @stuart-wallace given how easy its been for us to bat and our 3rd choice bowling attack, how many overs of wicketless cricket would you wait?

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6114

    @luke-weston said in BTC Cricket Trading Thread:

    Will be ltd when WI bat for early wickets but expect to be switching to a lay of Eng once a partnership gets going

    If a partnership gets going, it may be a better trade to Back WI - their odds are ridiculously high.

    ? ? 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6115

    Will be ltd when WI bat for early wickets but expect to be switching to a lay of Eng once a partnership gets going

    Stuart WallaceS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #6116

    NZ W still favs 1.66 YUK
    LAYED NZ want 3's
    hopefully solid start SA with bat

    happy days 3.1 taken

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #6117

    @matt-ayles Hopefully they prove me wrong but dont think it makes any difference with our bowling attack in this match

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6118

    Is this another west indian pitch thats impossible to take wickets on?

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #6119

    ENG win toss and Bat
    Wood and Overton out....Mahmood and Fisher in

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan BennettN Offline
    Nathan Bennett
    wrote on last edited by Nathan Bennett
    #6120

    LAYING some 1.3

    very alive

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.