Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
350 Posts 32 Posters 36.6k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to liam willis on last edited by Matt Wood
    #241

    @liam-willis said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    hi matt ive just looked through this, its very interesting, one question ive noticed its a lot of obscure leagues, i know you are paper trading but have you noticed any liquidity problems or games being suspended?

    Its set and forget pre KO. I asked Martin about this and he has found in his experience that even on the obscure leagues money gets matched, within reason obviously. I have had a little look and there is money on those leagues.

    Also there is no trading out of a position so no fear of getting 'stuck' in a trade due to liquidity issues.

    My own thoughts were that, after match odds, this is the most liquid market and so should be ok.

    Catch that Green!

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    liam willis
    wrote on last edited by
    #242

    hi matt ive just looked through this, its very interesting, one question ive noticed its a lot of obscure leagues, i know you are paper trading but have you noticed any liquidity problems or games being suspended?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Stuart Wallace on last edited by
    #243

    @stuart-wallace said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    I notice that the last 5 in the Spreadsheet had 5 incomplete results from today (13th) were all winners, so this would have taken the total profit to over 700 pounds.
    Very impressive.
    How much effort does it take to place the bets ? and is it best to Automate this daily?

    Its still all paper trading at the moment, no actual trades placed yet.

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #244

    @paul-benstead-0 said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Ok so I have finished messing about with my data.

    I 'think' (I'm still learning here) that I have found a good path forward.

    Ok so;
    limiting Home conceded ave. (line 2 of filter) to a max of 1.00.
    Limiting Away conceded ave. (line 4 of filter) to a max of 0.6.
    Minimum odds of 1.6

    Also removing any leagues that have made a loss of 2pts or more from my list Australia, Romania and Slovenia.

    This leaves 272 winners from 435 games, 62.53% with ave odds of 1.89.

    P/L after comm, 74.88pts.

    @matt-wood, You have min odds set at 1.6, but have you considered setting a max odds?

    Not yet, that may be something to look at later, although some of the large odds games that you think 'no way' when downloading are winners.

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart WallaceS Offline
    Stuart Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #245

    I notice that the last 5 in the Spreadsheet had 5 incomplete results from today (13th) were all winners, so this would have taken the total profit to over 700 pounds.
    Very impressive.
    How much effort does it take to place the bets ? and is it best to Automate this daily?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #246

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Ok so I have finished messing about with my data.

    I 'think' (I'm still learning here) that I have found a good path forward.

    Ok so;
    limiting Home conceded ave. (line 2 of filter) to a max of 1.00.
    Limiting Away conceded ave. (line 4 of filter) to a max of 0.6.
    Minimum odds of 1.6

    Also removing any leagues that have made a loss of 2pts or more from my list Australia, Romania and Slovenia.

    This leaves 272 winners from 435 games, 62.53% with ave odds of 1.89.

    P/L after comm, 74.88pts.

    @matt-wood, You have min odds set at 1.6, but have you considered setting a max odds?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #247

    @matt-wood variance has reduced massively since I removed the poor performing leagues, so far anyway 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to David Pickett on last edited by
    #248

    @david-pickett said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @david-pickett

    I think, as Martin has mentioned, the variance on this is enormous. For example your Turkey stats are shocking, yet mine are 38.50 to the good. But looking at my results the Turkish league recently had a run of 8 losers in a row.

    I think I will keep all leagues in for testing for another 500 games, and then compare the two sets of results. If I was using real money, I'm not sure I would have made it past the first ten days.

    Haha yea probably not for the feint hearted this one 🙂

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    David Pickett
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #249

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @david-pickett

    I think, as Martin has mentioned, the variance on this is enormous. For example your Turkey stats are shocking, yet mine are 38.50 to the good. But looking at my results the Turkish league recently had a run of 8 losers in a row.

    I think I will keep all leagues in for testing for another 500 games, and then compare the two sets of results. If I was using real money, I'm not sure I would have made it past the first ten days.

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to David Pickett on last edited by
    #250

    @david-pickett

    I think, as Martin has mentioned, the variance on this is enormous. For example your Turkey stats are shocking, yet mine are 38.50 to the good. But looking at my results the Turkish league recently had a run of 8 losers in a row.

    Catch that Green!

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to David Pickett on last edited by
    #251

    @david-pickett said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood
    I think so, I tend to change the odds filter, but I can't remember if I did with this one. Odds over 1.5, does that sound right?

    Cheers for this strategy, I'm absolutely gobsmacked by it.

    Yes Martin's limit was/is 1.5. I have tried altering things a little on my test.

    Your welcome, was a total fluke really so not sure how much credit there is 😆 Doesn't matter if we all get some green trades out of it though 🙂

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    David Pickett
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #252

    @matt-wood
    I think so, I tend to change the odds filter, but I can't remember if I did with this one. Odds over 1.5, does that sound right?

    Cheers for this strategy, I'm absolutely gobsmacked by it.

    Matt WoodM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to David Pickett on last edited by
    #253

    @david-pickett Excellent stuff David 👍

    Did you run your tests without changing anything from the download (exactly as Martin is running his)?

    Catch that Green!

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    David Pickett
    wrote on last edited by David Pickett
    #254

    There has been a lot of great work on this strategy, thanks, everyone. I've been running my own tests. I'm not sure if this is useful or confusing by adding more figures, but here are the results from my first 500 bets.
    0_1647187241026_8805c53b-9835-47cb-a03f-b662285489b4-image.png

    By excluding the leagues which have played a minimum of ten games and are showing a negative return the profits increase from £381.50 to £633.30. The excluded leagues are:

    0_1647187416145_570bd8b5-6662-47fa-ae76-457c5b30236a-image.png

    Note that I forgot to take off the 2% commission, so the profits are slightly less.

    Here are the daily figures.
    0_1647188347195_55e26a01-67f3-4d9b-b765-dbc62890072e-image.png

    0_1647188379674_3cb9ef69-435e-462c-b132-980dd0b5acac-image.png

    Blue is daily, brown is rolling.

    It took ten days to show a profit.

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #255

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @paul-benstead-0 said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Ok so I have finished messing about with my data.

    I 'think' (I'm still learning here) that I have found a good path forward.

    Ok so;
    limiting Home conceded ave. (line 2 of filter) to a max of 1.00.
    Limiting Away conceded ave. (line 4 of filter) to a max of 0.6.
    Minimum odds of 1.6

    Also removing any leagues that have made a loss of 2pts or more from my list Australia, Romania and Slovenia.

    This leaves 272 winners from 435 games, 62.53% with ave odds of 1.89.

    P/L after comm, 74.88pts.

    @matt-wood, Why just those 3 leagues? I see others with a loss of 2pts or more in your list.

    Afternoon Paul. Are you referring to the table I posted a little while back? If so that was a bit before the 1000 game mark so those leagues will have recovered a bit to make me keep them in.

    This is still all in testing though so I am sure things may change again

    Yes I was, and thanks for doing this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #256

    @paul-benstead-0 said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Ok so I have finished messing about with my data.

    I 'think' (I'm still learning here) that I have found a good path forward.

    Ok so;
    limiting Home conceded ave. (line 2 of filter) to a max of 1.00.
    Limiting Away conceded ave. (line 4 of filter) to a max of 0.6.
    Minimum odds of 1.6

    Also removing any leagues that have made a loss of 2pts or more from my list Australia, Romania and Slovenia.

    This leaves 272 winners from 435 games, 62.53% with ave odds of 1.89.

    P/L after comm, 74.88pts.

    @matt-wood, Why just those 3 leagues? I see others with a loss of 2pts or more in your list.

    Afternoon Paul. Are you referring to the table I posted a little while back? If so that was a bit before the 1000 game mark so those leagues will have recovered a bit to make me keep them in.

    This is still all in testing though so I am sure things may change again

    Catch that Green!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #257

    @matt-wood said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    Ok so I have finished messing about with my data.

    I 'think' (I'm still learning here) that I have found a good path forward.

    Ok so;
    limiting Home conceded ave. (line 2 of filter) to a max of 1.00.
    Limiting Away conceded ave. (line 4 of filter) to a max of 0.6.
    Minimum odds of 1.6

    Also removing any leagues that have made a loss of 2pts or more from my list Australia, Romania and Slovenia.

    This leaves 272 winners from 435 games, 62.53% with ave odds of 1.89.

    P/L after comm, 74.88pts.

    @matt-wood, Why just those 3 leagues? I see others with a loss of 2pts or more in your list.

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #258

    @paul-benstead-0 yes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Kevin Pepper on last edited by
    #259

    @kevin-pepper Thanks for your help Kevin.

    Certainly something I will be factoring in going forward 👍

    Catch that Green!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kevin Pepper
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #260

    @matt-wood it could be but anyway it's worth factoring in yield when you're looking at the possible p/l.
    Good luck!

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.