Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Football Trading
350 Posts 32 Posters 36.6k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #301

    Does anyone have a list of leagues they use? I'm just starting to test this and it woul dbe helpful to get a head start.

    MartinM 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #302

    @james-rome not fully but got around 500 results, all I am doing at the moment is removing some of the rubbish leagues, if only to make the amount of selections slightly more manageable!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #303

    hey been following this so has been fully tested now

    MartinM Matt WoodM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #304

    @matt-wood I'll be a pain today as I am doing a deep dive analysis 😄

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #305

    @matt-wood similar for me, I will ditch those leagues moving forward as we have the same trend over a lot of games

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #306

    @martin Spain 7.5pts down and Slovenia 2.5pts down

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #307

    @matt-wood thanks how does Spain and Slovenia do for you? Profit wise?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #308

    @martin Morning.

    Unfiltered: 55.37% 438 winners from 791 games

    Odds 1.75 to 2.25: 55.56% 200 winners from 360 games

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    wrote on last edited by
    #309

    @Matt-Wood could you do me a favour and run your selection only between 1.75 and 2.25 odds and let me know how those results compare to your current ones?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #310

    @matt-wood interesting so maybe that suggests some of the more obscure leagues are performing well at those odds

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by Matt Wood
    #311

    @martin yea no probs. I dont think I have as many leagues as you. I just messed about with the odds limits on mine and it improves things but not quite as much as yours did.

    I have been messing about with the filter settings to see if the sr can climb whilst still keeping a fairly high average odds.

    Have got it to 59.41% with ave odds of 1.94. 180 winners from 303 games. Should be 41pts profit on my tests from that.

    If I then also plug in your odds min of 1.75:

    58.59%, 150 winners from 256, ave odds 2.02.

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #312

    @matt-wood when you get to 1000 can you send me the sheet, would like to run the odds filters through it and see if the pattern remains the same

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #313

    @martin Oh wow yes, could be that 1.75 is the sweet spot 👍

    currently got 714 with today's download. Missed a couple of days at the start of the week though with not internet.

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #314

    @matt-wood min odds of 1.75 even better I've edited post to reflect those results.

    How many results do you have on your sheet?

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #315

    @martin Thats quite a nice increase in the profit there though 👍

    I think, following your observations about variance, I am going to let mine run to 1000 games before I change anything.

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    wrote on last edited by Martin
    #316

    Min odds of 1.75 gives a profit to £10 stakes of £376.37 from 287 selections

    Just run some numbers, if you increase min odds to 1.8.

    £308.39 profit from 258 selections.

    1.5 odds plus is £248.31 profit from 391 selections.

    Not going to change anything in testing yet but may do after 500-1000 results.

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Lee Leadbetter on last edited by
    #317

    @lee-leadbetter brilliant! keep us updated

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lee Leadbetter
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #318

    @martin said in Matt's Under 2.5 Goals Strategy Thread:

    @matt-wood I'll filter out more leagues when I get a lot more data but in theory there is no good reason to lessen selections just based on volume. If selections are yielding profit in terms of mathematics the more the merrier! As you will make more money over time with more selections, if all selections have the same expected value.

    This is true, would need a large bankroll to play 64 selections on a saturday though haha, you can scale to suit your bank of course but alot of matches all the same.
    I am running my own FHG S&F strategy, will share if it is producing, only 2 weeks in so will require alot more testing, probably until end of the european league season tbh. Currently its in profit £130 on £10 stakes anyway, around 100 games. Not bad.
    was up to £170 and then saturday sunday have been poor and its taken a hit.

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #319

    @matt-wood I'll filter out more leagues when I get a lot more data but in theory there is no good reason to lessen selections just based on volume. If selections are yielding profit in terms of mathematics the more the merrier! As you will make more money over time with more selections, if all selections have the same expected value.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to Martin on last edited by
    #320

    @martin Yes I just looked at that, some big numbers. 341 selections though! Surely that needs to come down a bit 🙂

    I thought my version got hammered yesterday but was up 3.6 points.

    Catch that Green!

    MartinM 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.