Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Yeti)
  • No Skin
Collapse

BTTS filter which might turn into something else

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Member Filters & Projects
13 Posts 6 Posters 1.4k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi all,

    I've been working on some BTTS filters and have a few different ones which I am tracking at present. I have been interested in this market because it has potential to be used for O2.5 trades as well and the BTTS odds are normally higher than the O1.5's.

    Now that one of the filters has hit 200 selections I am looking to get some feedback on whether the strike rate is comparable with what others are achieving in this market. I have also recorded the O1.5, O2.5, FHG & SHG's from the selections with the results being:

    0_1621956770842_6d81031b-d373-4e01-911a-19a5ad9ee480-image.png

    So basically is 62.5% a reasonable strike rate for this market?

    I have broken the selections down by country but don't really have enough games yet to make any judgements on that front with the possible exception of Germany where there has been 25 matches and 80% have been BTTS.

    What also caught my eye is the SHG strike rate which is 87% out of the 200 games so it might be that I end up using this filter as a HT LTD/LCS.

    The odds for this market vary quite a lot depending on country / teams, for example last night's Zamalek game in Egypt had BTTS at 2.1 before kick off on B365 (didn't manage to see what it was on the BF exchange) whilst I have seen others as low as 1.4 pre-game.

    I haven't decided how to play this as a BTTS trade but was thinking along the lines of entering about 15 mins into the game and possibly doing a split stake.

    I hope this makes some sense to you all and I would welcome any advice or pointers

    Thanks,

    Ian

    Matt WoodM S MartinM RyanR 4 Replies Last reply
    4
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #2

    @darri Thanks for the pointers Darri. The O1.5 is an angle which I definitely want to improve on as I collect some more data. At present I'm using this as for SHG as long as the in play stats look good.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    This is great to see mate! For me BTTS markets can be a ball ache over time. There is some quality data going on there with the overs markets. The thing here is to perhaps look at the best performing ones. So the SHG and o1.5 could they be improved. Typically when we are building data from a direction of another market we dont narrow down on criteria that would be of better use in those other angles. Now perhaps would be a good time to start testing the other angles further. That SHG strike rate looks very healthy but im sure if you put more data/criteria crunching that it could get closer to 90%. Start eliminating underperforming leagues and scorelines and im sure you can tweak that further.

    Lovely stuff tho mate keep it up 👍

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RyanR Offline
    RyanR Offline
    Ryan
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #4

    @ian-wylie Nice, I love it when a filter becomes something else shows the power of the data and tracking - look at that Over 1.5s!!!

    Founder of BTC - Pro Trader - Main Sports Tennis and Football

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Stuart Capstick on last edited by
    #5

    @stuart-capstick Thanks Stuart, that's an very interesting point which I'll take a look at.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #6

    @matt-wood Hi Matt, on this particular filter the scope is set to last 10 games although I do have a criteria in the filter for matches played being greater than or equal to 5. So thinking about it not sure if this criteria is actually doing anything with the scope being set to 10?

    I think I'll start another filter but with the scope set to 5 and track it alongside this one to see what difference there is.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Morning Ian, what scope do you use on your filters for this? I cannot decide how many games to draw the data from. Gone with last 5 for recent form but not sure if thats the best way.

    Catch that Green!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MartinM Offline
    MartinM Offline
    Martin btc team
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #8

    @ian-wylie following with interest, never had much luck myself with BTTS but to be fair I've not really tried to come up with anything on it very hard.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Stuart Capstick
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #9

    @ian-wylie

    Have a look at the differences in the BTTS rates when the away team scores first compared to when the home team scores first.

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #10

    @matt-wood No I haven't restricted any leagues at present, once I have more results and can form a clearer picture then I'm sure I will.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by
    #11

    @ian-wylie

    Yes I was expecting something similar to you with the O1.5 since a BTTS win is also an O1.5 win. O1.5 on mine is 81.58%, which I also expected to be a little higher. Time will tell I guess, things may even out on my filter as its so early can't really draw any conclusions from it yet.

    I did initially restrict my league selection to those leagues with a 45% and up historical O2.5. Did you restrict your leagues at all or have you just left it wide open to all leagues in the software?

    Catch that Green!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    replied to Matt Wood on last edited by
    #12

    @matt-wood Thanks Matt,

    That sounds like a good start over 73%, it will be interesting to see how that develops. With regards the O1.5, I had expected the strike rate to be a bit better as the filter is looking for BTTS which is of course O1.5 but the other BTTS filters I'm tracking are about the same with 1 being down at 73% but it's very early days for those ones.

    Matt WoodM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt WoodM Offline
    Matt Wood
    replied to A Former User on last edited by Matt Wood
    #13

    @ian-wylie Seems a decent SHG sr to me, although there are some SHG experts hanging around here somewhere 😉 they would tell you better than me!

    Ive been testing something with a very similar idea to this. I have not hit 100 games yet though so VERY early days for me, just as a comparison though my BTTS sr is currently 73.68% and an average pre KO odds of 1.36. As I said though this is early days for mine so I expect that sr will come down somewhat.

    Curiously though your O1.5 sr is better than mine...

    Catch that Green!

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.