The BTC Horse Racing Thread
-
@alan-steward seemed like loads went under 1.8 there
-
Just got 4 matched on the 8.30.
-
Put it in simulation mode
3 Horses matched in simulation mode lol
-
@martin-futter Def not only 8 runners and odds criteria not available 21.00pm though is good atm
-
@richard-latimer no not much qualified today, these don't either truly but 9pm is worth testing.
-
Looks like one of the under 11.0 odds has dropped out in the 20:30 so now 1 less runner and 1 less under 11 lay odds
-
@james-everard would like to get a community spreadsheet going to track the best parameters
-
@martin-futter Cool i will keep an eye on that race as well
-
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@james-everard not sure tbh guess we will find out in the next hour, fav drifting in 8.30 could make it a possible play too
Did you do any of others today @Martin-Futter? Couldnt see that any others qualified.
-
@james-everard not sure tbh guess we will find out in the next hour, fav drifting in 8.30 could make it a possible play too
-
20:30 now got 4 under Lay odds of 11.0
Will run in simulation mode prepping for 21:00
-
@martin-futter said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
@alan-steward 9pm looks ok to me slightly long but other than that it's the parameters we want
Do you think that extra furlong makes much difference as i don't have much knowledge of horse racing learning all the time.
-
Does anybody use Fairbot?
I know how to Lay All @ 1.8 with the same stake but can you select the option for "Keep All" without having to go through the field and double click them and select "Keep"?
Cheers
@Ryan-Carruthers
-
@alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Looks like both the 20:30 & 21:00 qualifies for Lay The Field... Anybody else agrees?
The 21.00pm definitely does 5 under 10.0 odds fav 4.9.
-
@alan-steward said in The BTC Horse Racing Thread:
Looks like both the 20:30 & 21:00 qualifies for Lay The Field... Anybody else agrees?
they both look slightly long (1m1f) and the 20:30 has a fav below 4.0...unless you're being a bit flexible with the criteria
-
@alan-steward distance too long isn't it?
-
@alan-steward I reckon the 21:00 does as it fits the criteria down to a T almost, unless I've missed something.